RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 COVID-19 vaccination coverage and hesitancy among groups prioritised in Australia’s vaccine rollout
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.08.05.21261633
DO 10.1101/2021.08.05.21261633
A1 Aitken, Zoe
A1 Emerson, Eric
A1 Kavanagh, Anne
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/07/2021.08.05.21261633.abstract
AB Objectives This paper examines differences in vaccination coverage and hesitancy for people in vaccine priority groups.Design, setting, participants Using data from 2,400 Australians who participated in two waves of the Taking the Pulse of the Nation survey in April and May 2021, we describe vaccination coverage and hesitancy among vaccine priority groups including people with disability, people living with a severe mental health condition, a severe long-term health condition, those requiring frequent assistance with everyday activities, and people who provide paid or unpaid care.Main outcome measures The proportion of the sample who were vaccinated and who were vaccine hesitant, for the whole sample and for vaccine priority groups, disaggregated by age group and gender.Results COVID-19 vaccine coverage was estimated to be 8.2% overall, higher for people with severe long term health conditions (13.4%) and lower for people with severe mental health conditions (4.3%). Vaccine hesitancy was high overall (35.6%) and was found to be lower for people with disability (30.3%), with severe long term health conditions (27.7%), with frequent need for assistance (24.2%) and carers (30.7%), but similar for those with severe mental health conditions (36.1%).Conclusions Low vaccination coverage and high hesitancy for people in the priority groups leaves many people at significant risk of serious disease or death if infected with COVID-19. These findings demonstrate the urgent need for governments to enable easy access to vaccination for people in priority groups and to develop communication strategies to promote vaccination uptake, co-designed with the priority groups.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe project was funded by a NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence (1116385).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Taking the Pulse of the Nation Survey was approved by the Faculty of Business and Economics & Melbourne Business School Human Ethics Advisory Group (Ethics ID 2056754.1).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesResearchers can access the Taking the Pulse of the Nation Survey for research and replication purposes. To gain access, please contact Dr. Nicolas Salamanca at melb-inst@unimelb.edu.au.