PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Kapoor, Mayank
AU  - Kumar, Nitin
AU  - Panda, Prasan Kumar
TI  - The symptomatology of fever: a step towards qualitative definition of fever
AID  - 10.1101/2021.08.03.21261558
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.08.03.21261558
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/05/2021.08.03.21261558.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/05/2021.08.03.21261558.full
AB  - Background The old definitions of fever are based on cross-sectional surveys of the population without analyzing the associated symptomatology.Objectives To analyze associated symptoms with fever in a longitudinal follow-up study.Methods In a longitudinal study over one year, 196 participants recorded three temperature readings daily, one after waking up, one between 12-3 PM, one before sleeping, and filled the symptomatology questionnaire in a thermometry diary.Results Per protocol analysis was done for febrile participants (n=144). Fatigue (50.3%), warmth (47.3%), headache/head heaviness (47.0%), feeling malaise/general weakness (46.7%), loss of appetite (46.5%), muscle cramps/muscle aches (45.6%), chills/shivering (44.6%), increased sweating (43.0%), nausea (42.5%), irritability (38.9%), increased breathing rate (37.1%), and restlessness/anxiety/palpitations (36.5%) were the symptoms maximally seen during the febrile phase. A higher number of associated symptoms are associated with higher temperature readings. Dehydration suggested the numerically highest temperature values (100.86 ± 1.70°F) but seen in few febrile patients.Conclusions Incorporation of symptom analysis in febrile patients is the need of the hour. Fatigue and warmth are found to be most prevelent symptoms during febrile phase. Associated symptoms can help in predicting the intensity of fever also.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study is approved by Institute Ethical Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh (No. 235/IEC/PGM/2019).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesIt will be made available to others as required upon requesting the corresponding author.