RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 SCU-Net: A deep learning method for segmentation and quantification of breast arterial calcifications on mammograms
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.07.30.21261406
DO 10.1101/2021.07.30.21261406
A1 Guo, Xiaoyuan
A1 O’Neill, W Charles
A1 Vey, Brianna
A1 Yang, Tianen Christopher
A1 Kim, Thomas J
A1 Ghassemi, Maryzeh
A1 Pan, Ian
A1 Gichoya, Judy Wawira
A1 Trivedi, Hari
A1 Banerjee, Imon
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/05/2021.07.30.21261406.abstract
AB Purpose Measurements of breast arterial calcifications (BAC) can offer a personalized, noninvasive approach to risk-stratify women for cardiovascular disease such as heart attack and stroke. We aim to detect and segment breast arterial calcifications in mammograms accurately and suggest novel measurements to quantify detected BAC for future clinical applications.Methods To separate BAC in mammograms, we propose a light-weight fine vessel segmentation method Simple Context U-Net (SCU-Net). Due to the large image size of mammograms, we adopt a patch-based way to train SCU-Net and obtain the final whole-image-size results by stitching patch-wise results together. To further quantify calcifications, we test five quantitative metrics to inspect the progression of BAC for subjects: Sum of Mask Probability Metric (𝒫ℳ), Sum of Mask Area Metric (𝒜ℳ), Sum of Mask Intensity Metric (𝒮ℐℳ), Sum of Mask Area with Threshold Intensity Metric (𝒯𝒜ℳX) and Sum of Mask Intensity with Threshold X Metric (𝒯 𝒮ℐℳX). Finally, we demonstrate the ability of the metrics to longitudinally measure calcifications in a group of 26 subjects and evaluate our quantification metrics compared to calcified voxels and calcium mass on breast CT for 10 subjects.Results Our segmentation results are compared with state-of-the-art network architectures based on recall, precision, accuracy, F1-score/Dice Score and Jaccard Index evaluation metrics and achieve corresponding values of 0.789, 0.708, 0.997, 0.729, and 0.581 for whole-image-size results. The quantification results all show >95% correlation between quantification measures on predicted masks of SCU-Net as compared to the groundtruth and measurement of calcification on breast CT. For the calcifications quantification measurement, our calcification volume (voxels) results yield R2-correlation values of 0.834, 0.843, 0.832, 0.798, and 0.800 for the 𝒫ℳ, 𝒜ℳ, 𝒮ℐℳ, 𝒯𝒜ℳ100, 𝒯 𝒮ℐℳ100 metrics, respectively; our calcium mass results yield comparable R2-correlation values of 0.866, 0.873, 0.840, 0.774, and 0.798 for the same metrics.Conclusions SCU-Net is a simple method to accurately segment arterial calcification retrospectively on routine mammograms. Quantification of the calcifications based on this segmentation in the retrospective cohort study has sufficient sensitivity to detect the normal progression over time and should be useful for future research and clinical applications.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe work is supported by Winship Invest\$ Pilot Grant Program.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Emory University Institutional Review BoardAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient data privacy restrictions, but a de-identified subset of the data is available on reasonable request.