RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Prospective assessment of catheter-associated bacteriuria in nursing home residents: clinical presentation, epidemiology, and colonization dynamics
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.09.29.20204107
DO 10.1101/2020.09.29.20204107
A1 Armbruster, Chelsie E.
A1 Brauer, Aimee L.
A1 Humby, Monica S.
A1 Shao, Jiahui
A1 Chakraborty, Saptarshi
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/04/2020.09.29.20204107.abstract
AB Background Catheterization facilitates continuous bacteriuria, for which the clinical significance remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the clinical presentation, epidemiology, and dynamics of bacteriuria in a cohort of long-term catheterized nursing home residents.Methods Prospective urine culture, urinalysis, chart review, and assessment of signs and symptoms of infection were performed weekly for 19 study participants over 7 months. All bacteria ≥103 cfu/ml were cultured, isolated, identified, and tested for susceptibility to select antimicrobials.Results 226 of the 234 urines were polymicrobial (97%), with an average of 4.7 isolates per weekly specimen. 228 urines (97%) exhibited ≥106 CFU/ml, 220 (94%) exhibited abnormal urinalysis, 126 (54%) were associated with at least one possible sign or symptom of infection, 82 (35%) would potentially meet a standardized definition of CAUTI, but only 3 had a caregiver diagnosis of CAUTI. 286 (30%) of bacterial isolates were resistant to a tested antimicrobial agent, and bacteriuria composition was remarkably stable despite a combined total of 54 catheter changes and 23 weeks of antimicrobial use.Conclusions Bacteriuria composition was largely polymicrobial, including persistent colonization by organisms previously considered to be urine culture contaminants. Neither antimicrobial use nor catheter changes sterilized the urine, at most resulting in transient reductions in bacterial burden followed by new acquisition of resistant isolates. Thus, this patient population exhibits a high prevalence of bacteriuria coupled with potential indicators of infection, necessitating further exploration to identify sensitive markers of true infection.Funding This work was supported by the NIH (R00 DK105205, R01 DK123158, UL1 TR001412)Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis was an observational study without any interventionFunding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institutes of Health via the National Institute of Diabetes Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R00 DK105205 and R01 DK123158 to C.E.A.] and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR001412 to the University at Buffalo). The sponsors were not involved in the study design, methods, subject recruitment, data collections, analysis, or preparation of the paper. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the University at Buffalo Institutional Review Board (STUDY00002526) and complied with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and local laws and regulations.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data are provided within the manuscript and supplemental files.