RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Comparison of reported main COVID-19 information sources in national and culturally and linguistically diverse communities in Australia
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.07.29.21261321
DO 10.1101/2021.07.29.21261321
A1 Ayre, J
A1 Muscat, DMM
A1 Mac, O
A1 Batcup, C
A1 Cvejic, E
A1 Pickles, K
A1 Dolan, H
A1 Bonner, C
A1 Mouwad, D
A1 Zachariah, D
A1 Turalic, U
A1 Santalucia, Y
A1 Chen, T
A1 Vasic, G
A1 McCaffery, K
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/01/2021.07.29.21261321.abstract
AB Background To manage the COVID-19 pandemic effectively, governments need clear and effective communication. This is a challenge for culturally diverse communities as groups may have different informational needs and information-seeking behaviours. In this paper we present the frequency of information sources for COVID-19 in a culturally diverse area of Sydney, Australia.Methods This study reports findings from two surveys. The first recruited participants across 10 languages between March 21 and July 9, 2021. The second provides a point of reference, and was an Australian, nationally-representative sample of English-speaking participants between November 4 – 18, 2020.Results For the survey in culturally and linguistically diverse communities, of 708 participants, mean age was 45.4 years (SE 0.78), and 51% of respondents were female. Across all language groups, 54.7% of participants used Australian official or public broadcasters to find out about COVID-19 (n=421). Australian commercial information sources (54.1%, n=417), social media (51.6%, n=397), and family and friends in Australia (32.7%, n=252) were common sources. Patterns varied substantially across language groups. In the nationally representative survey (n=2313), 67% of participants (n=1540) used Australian official or public broadcasters, with lower proportions for social media (31.9%, n=738) and friends, family or other personal sources (23.1%; n=533).Conclusion Almost 50% of participants from culturally and linguistically diverse communities did not report using Australian official or public broadcaster as main sources of information. Instead Australian commercial information sources, friends and family, overseas sources and social media were common. Though a crude comparison of the two datasets, this data can guide policy decisions for communication to different community groups. Further analysis is needed to interpret this data. Better understanding of how diverse communities seek and receive COVID-19 health information is imperative as we manage the current COVID-19 outbreak in the Sydney region.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors received no specific funding for this work. Kirsten McCaffery is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Principal Research Fellowship, #APP112111. Julie Ayre is supported by an NHMRC Program grant to Wiser Healthcare # APP1113532.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (Project number 2020/ETH03085) and the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2020/212).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData available upon reasonable request from corresponding author.