RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Prospective examination of mental health in university students during the COVID-19 pandemic
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.07.29.21261196
DO 10.1101/2021.07.29.21261196
A1 Jia, Ru
A1 Knight, Holly
A1 Ayling, Kieran
A1 Coupland, Carol
A1 Corner, Jessica
A1 Denning, Chris
A1 Ball, Jonathan
A1 Bolton, Kirsty
A1 Morling, Joanne R
A1 Figueredo, Grazziela
A1 Morris, David Ed
A1 Tighe, Patrick
A1 Villalon, Armando
A1 Blake, Holly
A1 Vedhara, Kavita
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/31/2021.07.29.21261196.abstract
AB Background The impact of changing social restrictions on the mental health of students during the COVID-19 pandemic warrants exploration.Aims To prospectively examine changes to university students’ mental health during the pandemic.Methods Students completed repeated online surveys at three time points (October 2020 (baseline), February 2021, March 2021) to explore relationships between demographic and psychological factors (loneliness and positive mood) and mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, and stress).Results A total of 893 students participated. Depression and anxiety levels were higher at all timepoints than pre-pandemic normative data (p<.001). Scores on all mental health measures were highest in February, with depression and anxiety remaining significantly higher in March than baseline. Female students and those with previous mental health disorders were at greatest risk of poor mental health outcomes. Lower positive mood and greater loneliness at baseline were associated with greater depression and anxiety at follow-ups. Baseline positive mood predicted improvement of depression and anxiety at follow-ups.Conclusion Depression and anxiety were significantly higher than pre-pandemic norms, with female students and those with previous mental health difficulties being at greatest risk. Given these elevated rates, universities should ensure adequate support is available to meet potentially increased demand for services.Competing Interest StatementAll authors were employees of University of Nottingham (UoN), the institution at which data were collected. J.C. sits on the Executive Board for UoN. No other conflicts of interest were declared.Funding StatementThe study was funded by the Medical Research Council (Reference: MC_PC_20027, Principal Investigator J.B.) and the Institute for Policy and Engagement at the University of Nottingham (QR Duning Award, H.B., J.R.M., K.V.). JRM receives salary support from a Medical Research Council Clinician Scientist Fellowship [grant number MR/P008348/1]. The sponsors had no involvement in the study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or the preparation of the article. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funders.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was received from the University of Nottingham Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee (FMHS 96-0920).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be deposited in the University of Nottingham data archive. Access to this dataset will be embargoed for a period of 12 months in order for us to complete further analysis of the dataset. After that it may be shared with the consent of the Chief Investigator.