RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Exposure to wildfire smoke and particulate matter among Washington State construction workers; potential impacts and implications for worker protection
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.07.19.21260289
DO 10.1101/2021.07.19.21260289
A1 Zuidema, Christopher
A1 Austin, Elena
A1 Cohen, Martin A.
A1 Kasner, Edward
A1 Liu, Lilian
A1 Isaksen, Tania Busch
A1 Spector, June
A1 Seto, Edmund
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/22/2021.07.19.21260289.abstract
AB Driven by climate change, wildfires are increasing in frequency, duration, and intensity across the Western United States. Outdoor workers are being exposed to increasing wildfire-related particulate matter and smoke. Recognizing this emerging risk, Washington adopted an emergency rule and is presently engaged in creating a permanent rule to protect outdoor workers from wildfire smoke exposure. While there are growing bodies of literature on the exposure to and health effects of wildfire smoke in the general public and wildland firefighters, there is a gap in knowledge about wildfire smoke exposure among outdoor workers generally, and construction workers specifically, a large category of outdoor workers in Washington totaling 200,000 people. In this study, we link several data sources including state-collected employment data and national ambient air quality data to gain insight into the risk of wildfire exposure among construction workers in Washington. Our results indicate the number of poor air quality days has increased in August and September in recent years. We also observed that over the last decade these months with the greatest potential for wildfire smoke exposure coincide with an annual peak in construction employment that was typically 9.4 to 42.7% larger across Washington counties (one county was 75.8%). Lastly, we considered different air quality thresholds and retrospectively tallied days in Washington that would have triggered rules protecting workers from wildfire smoke. We found the “encouraged” threshold of the Washington emergency rule (20.5 g/m3) would result in 5.5 times more days subject to the wildfire rule on average across all Washington counties compared to its “required” threshold (55.5 g/m3), and in 2020 the rule could have created demand for 1.35 million N-95 filtering facepiece respirators among construction workers. These results have important implications for both employers and policy makers as rules are developed. We also discuss the potential economic and policy implications of wildfire smoke exposure, exposure control strategies, and data gaps that would improve our understanding of construction worker exposure to wildfire smoke.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementCZ was supported by the University of Washington's Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Bioinformatics Training in Environmental Health (BEBTEH), grant number T32ES015459, from the National Institute for Environmental Health Science (NIEHS). JTS was supported by CDC/NIOSH grant numbers T42OH008433.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study analyzed publicly available secondary data. It involved no human subjects or human subjects data and was therefore was not subject to IRB review.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data in this study are publicly available secondary data accessible at the links below. https://esd.wa.gov/labormarketinfo/covered-employment https://esd.wa.gov/labormarketinfo/employment-estimates https://aqs.epa.gov/aqsweb/airdata/download_files.html