PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Kahn, Rebecca
AU  - Schrag, Stephanie J.
AU  - Verani, Jennifer R.
AU  - Lipsitch, Marc
TI  - Identifying and alleviating bias due to differential depletion of susceptible people in post-marketing evaluations of COVID-19 vaccines
AID  - 10.1101/2021.07.15.21260595
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.07.15.21260595
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/19/2021.07.15.21260595.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/19/2021.07.15.21260595.full
AB  - Recent studies have provided key information about SARS-CoV-2 vaccines’ efficacy and effectiveness (VE). One important question that remains is whether the protection conferred by vaccines wanes over time. However, estimates over time are subject to bias from differential depletion of susceptibles between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Here we examine the extent to which biases occur under different scenarios and assess whether serologic testing has the potential to correct this bias. By identifying non-vaccine antibodies, these tests could identify individuals with prior infection. We find that the main determinant of bias is the proportion of the population that has been infected since vaccination began, which is influenced by several factors. In scenarios with high baseline VE, differential depletion of susceptibles creates minimal bias in VE estimates. However, if VE is lower, the bias for leaky vaccines (that reduce individual probability of infection given contact) is larger and should be corrected if the mechanism is known to be leaky. Conducting analyses both unadjusted and adjusted for past infection could give lower and upper bounds for the true VE. Studies of VE should therefore enroll individuals regardless of prior infection history but also collect information, ideally through serologic testing, on this critical variable.Competing Interest StatementDr. Lipsitch reports consulting/honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi Pasteur, and Merck, as well as a grant through his institution, unrelated to COVID-19, from Pfizer. He has served as an unpaid advisor related to COVID-19 to Pfizer, One Day Sooner, Astra-Zeneca, Janssen, and COVAX (United Biomedical). Dr. Kahn discloses consulting fees from Partners In Health.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the U.S. National Cancer Institute Seronet cooperative agreement U01CA261277. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesCode is available on github. https://github.com/rek160/spurious-waning