PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Freeman, Matthew C.
AU  - Delea, Maryann G.
AU  - Snyder, Jedidiah S.
AU  - Garn, Joshua V.
AU  - Belew, Mulusew
AU  - Caruso, Bethany A.
AU  - Clasen, Thomas F.
AU  - Sclar, Gloria D.
AU  - Tesfaye, Yihenew
AU  - Woreta, Mulat
AU  - Zewudie, Kassahun
AU  - Gebremariam, Abebe
TI  - The impact of a demand-side sanitation and hygiene promotion intervention on sustained behavior change and health in Amhara, Ethiopia: a cluster-randomized trial
AID  - 10.1101/2021.07.15.21260587
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.07.15.21260587
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/19/2021.07.15.21260587.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/19/2021.07.15.21260587.full
AB  - Background Behaviors related to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) are key drivers of infectious disease transmission, and experiences of WASH are potential influencers of mental well-being. Important knowledge gaps exist related to the content and delivery of effective WASH programs and their associated health impacts, particularly within the contexts of government programs implemented at scale.Methods We developed and tested a demand-side intervention called Andilaye, which aimed to change behaviors related to sanitation, personal hygiene, and household environmental sanitation. This theory-informed intervention was delivered through the existing Ethiopian Health Extension Programme (HEP). It was a multilevel intervention with a catalyzing event at community level and behavior change activities at group and household level. We randomly selected and assigned 50 kebeles (sub-districts) from three woredas (districts), half to receive the Andilaye intervention, and half the standard of care sanitation and hygiene programming (i.e., community-led total sanitation and hygiene [CLTSH]). We collected data on WASH access, behavioral outcomes, and mental well-being.Results A total of 1,589 households were enrolled into the study at baseline; 1,472 households (94%) participated in an endline assessment two years after baseline, and approximately 14 months after the initiation of a multi-level intervention. The intervention did not improve construction of latrines (prevalence ratio [PR] 0.99; 95% CI: 0.82, 1.21) or handwashing stations with water (PR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.26), or the removal of animal feces from the compound (PR=1.10; 95% CI: 0.95, 1.28). Nor did it impact anxiety (PR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.11), depression (PR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.07), emotional distress (PR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.67,1.09) or well-being (PR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.74, 1.10) scores.Discussion We report limited impact of the intervention, as delivered, on changes inbehavior and mental well-being. The effectiveness of the intervention was limited by poor intervention fidelity. While sanitation and hygiene improvements have been documented in Ethiopia, behavioral slippage, or regression to unimproved practices, in communities previously declared open defecation free is widespread. Evidence from this trial may help address knowledge gaps related to challenges associated with scalable alternatives to CLTSH and inform sanitation and hygiene programming and policy in Ethiopia and beyond.Trial registration This trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03075436) on March 9, 2017.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT03075436Funding StatementThis work was supported by the World Bank Group Strategic Impact Evaluation Fund (SIEF, 7175829), Children Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF, 1606-01334), and the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie, TW11.1016). Inputs from the World Bank Group and 3ie influenced some aspects of the study design. The funders have otherwise played no role in the design of the study; collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or writing of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for the Andilaye Trial was provided by Emory University (IRB00076141), the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (9595), and locally by the Amhara Regional Health Bureau (HRTT0135909). The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03075436) on March 9, 2017.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll de-identified data are publicly available. http://microdatalib.worldbank.org