RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Structural Neuroplasticity Following Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Secondary MRI Outcomes
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.07.13.21260466
DO 10.1101/2021.07.13.21260466
A1 Bishop, James
A1 Shpaner, Marina
A1 Kubicki, Antoni
A1 Naylor, Magdalena
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/16/2021.07.13.21260466.abstract
AB The extent of white matter (WM) and Grey matter (GM) structural neuroplasticity following cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain management remains undetermined. In the current study, we investigated structural alterations in GM morphometry, as well as WM complexity and connectivity, before and after an 11-week group CBT for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain. We hypothesized that effective pain management would influence WM structural metrics indicative of brain plasticity, particularly within cognitive and limbic circuitry as well as GM volume within pain matrix structures. To determine this, patients were randomized into two groups: 1) CBT group that received CBT once-weekly for 11-weeks, or 2) EDU group consisting of an active patient control group that received educational materials by mail. All subjects completed behavioral assessments and underwent neuroimaging at: baseline prior to any intervention (TP1), 11-weeks following either CBT or EDU (TP2), and four months following completion of the intervention (TP3). CBT resulted in significant clinical improvements, assessed via behavioral self-reports, compared to EDU. Compared to EDU, region of interest WM analysis revealed several fiber tracts that had significantly increased WM complexity following CBT intervention, including the bilateral posterior internal capsule and the left cingulum within the temporal lobe. Conversely, several tracts exhibited a decrease in WM complexity including the right external capsule, the left posterior internal capsule, and the right cingulum within the temporal lobe. Changes in clinical outcomes were predictive of alterations in WM complexity metrics immediately following intervention and at long-term follow-up. No between-group differences were observed in either WM connectivity or GM volume. In conclusion, psychotherapeutic interventions such as group CBT influence coping strategies for effective pain relief that influence WM microstructure, however, the mechanisms of these changes remain undetermined. Future studies will be required to uncover the biological underpinnings of these alterations in pain populations.Clinicaltrialsgov Can Therapy Alter CNS Processing of Chronic Pain: A Longitudinal Study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01794988?term=naylor&cntry=US&state=US%3AVT&draw=2&rank=1;NCT01794988). The study protocol was registered in the Clinical Trials Database.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT01794988Clinical Protocols https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01794988?term=naylor&cntry=US Funding StatementResearch reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01AR059674 (to MN). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. At not time did the authors receive any third party funding for any aspects of the study/work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the University of Vermont Institutional Review Board (IRB). All procedures were in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData available upon request.