RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 THE COMPARISON OF THREE REAL-TIME PCR KITS FOR SARS-COV-2 DIAGNOSIS REVEALS DISCREPANCIES ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF POSITIVE COVID-19 CASES AND DISPERSION ON THE VALUES OBTAINED FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 VARIANTS
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.07.13.21260484
DO 10.1101/2021.07.13.21260484
A1 Santibáñez, Álvaro
A1 Luraschi, Roberto
A1 Barrera-Avalos, Carlos
A1 Vallejos-Vidal, Eva
A1 Alarcón, Javiera
A1 Cayunao, Javiera
A1 Mella, Andrea
A1 Figueroa, Maximiliano
A1 Hernández, Felipe
A1 Plaza, Bárbara
A1 Inostroza-Molina, Ailen
A1 Valdés, Daniel
A1 Imarai, Mónica
A1 Acuña-Castillo, Claudio
A1 Reyes-López, Felipe E.
A1 Sandino, Ana María
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/16/2021.07.13.21260484.abstract
AB The COVID-19 pandemic has generated a huge challenge and threat to public health throughout the world population. Reverse transcription associated with real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) has been the gold-standard molecular tool for diagnosis and detection of the SARS-CoV-2. Currently, it is used as the main strategy for testing, traceability, and control of positive cases For this reason, the on-top high demand for reagents has produced stock-out on several occasions and the only alternative to keep population diagnosis has been the use of different RT-qPCR kits. Therefore, we evaluate the performance of three of the commercial RT-qPCR kits currently in use for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in Chile, consisting in: TaqMan 2019-nCoV Assay Kit v1 (Thermo). Real-Time Fluorescent RT-PCR Kit for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 (BGI), and LightCycler® Multiplex RNA Virus Master (Roche). Results of quantification cycle (Cq) and relative fluorescence units (RFU) obtained from their RT-qPCR reactions revealed important discrepancies on the total RNA required for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 genes and diagnosis. Marked differences between kits in samples with 30>Cq value< 34 was observed. Samples with positive diagnoses for Covid-19 using the Thermo Fisher kit had different results when the same samples were evaluated with Roche and BGI kits. The displacement on the Cq value for SARS-CoV-2 identification between the three different RT-qPCR kits was also evident when the presence of single nucleotide variants was evaluated in the context of genomic surveillance. Taken together, this study emphasizes the special care adjusting RT-qPCR reaction conditions of the different kits must be taken by all the laboratories before carrying out the detection of SARS-CoV-2 genes from total RNA nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementA.S. 21180465. National Research and Development Agency. https://www.anid.cl/. A.M.S. COVID1038. National Research and Development Agency. https://www.anid.cl/. M.I. 1201664. National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development. https://www.anid.cl/. F.E.R-L. 1211841. National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development. https://www.anid.cl/. C.A-C. 021943AC . Directorate of Scientific and Technological Research. https://www.vridei.usach.cl/direccion-de-investigacion-cientifica-y-tecnologica-0. EV-V. EQM200016. Fondo de Equipamiento Cientifico y Tecnologico. https://www.anid.cl/.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All the experimental procedures included in this study was authorized by the Ethical Committee of the University of Santiago of Chile (No. 226/2021) and the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Central Metropolitan Health Service, Ministry of Health, Government of Chile (No. 370/2021), and following the Chilean law in force.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are contained within the manuscript and its supporting information files.