RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Characteristics of children and antigen test performance at a SARS-CoV-2 community testing site
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.07.06.21259792
DO 10.1101/2021.07.06.21259792
A1 Ford, Laura
A1 Whaley, Melissa J.
A1 Shah, Melisa M.
A1 Salvatore, Phillip P.
A1 Segaloff, Hannah E.
A1 Delaney, Augustina
A1 Currie, Dustin W.
A1 Boyle-Estheimer, Lauren
A1 O’Hegarty, Michelle
A1 Morgan, Clint N.
A1 Meece, Jennifer
A1 Ivacic, Lynn
A1 Thornburg, Natalie J.
A1 Tamin, Azaibi
A1 Harcourt, Jennifer L.
A1 Folster, Jennifer M.
A1 Medrzycki, Magdalena
A1 Jain, Shilpi
A1 Wong, Phili
A1 Goffard, Kimberly
A1 Gieryn, Douglas
A1 Kahrs, Juliana
A1 Langolf, Kimberly
A1 Zochert, Tara
A1 Tate, Jacqueline E.
A1 Hsu, Christopher H.
A1 Kirking, Hannah L.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/07/2021.07.06.21259792.abstract
AB Background Performance characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests among children are limited despite the need for point-of-care testing in school and childcare settings. We describe children seeking SARS-CoV-2 testing at a community site and compare antigen test performance to real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and viral culture.Methods Two anterior nasal specimens were self-collected for BinaxNOW antigen and RT-PCR testing, along with demographics, symptoms, and exposure information from individuals ≥5 years at a community testing site. Viral culture was attempted on residual antigen or RT-PCR positive specimens. Demographic and clinical characteristics, and the performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests, were compared among children (<18 years) and adults.Results About one in ten included specimens were from children (225/2110); 16.4% (37/225) were RT-PCR positive. Cycle threshold values were similar among RT-PCR positive specimens from children and adults (22.5 vs 21.3, p=0.46) and among specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic children (22.5 vs 23.2, p=0.39). Sensitivity of antigen test compared to RT-PCR was 73.0% (27/37) among specimens from children and 80.8% (240/297) among specimens from adults; among specimens from children, specificity was 100% (188/188), positive and negative predictive value were 100% (27/27) and 94.9% (188/198) respectively. Virus was isolated from 51.4% (19/37) of RT-PCR positive pediatric specimens; all 19 had positive antigen test results.Conclusions With lower sensitivity relative to RT-PCR, antigen tests may not diagnose all positive COVID-19 cases; however, antigen testing identified children with live SARS-CoV-2 virus.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy. See e.g., 45 C.F.R. part 46.102(l)(2), 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. 241(d); 5 U.S.C. 552a; 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.