RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Autonomic dysfunction after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury: symptom spectrum and clinical testing outcomes
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.06.29.21259552
DO 10.1101/2021.06.29.21259552
A1 Li, Lucia M.
A1 Vichayanrat, Ekawat
A1 Giovane, Martina del
A1 Lai, Helen HL
A1 Iodice, Valeria
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/03/2021.06.29.21259552.abstract
AB Background and Objective Survivors of moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI) frequently experience chronic, debilitating somatic symptoms, which are largely unexplained. The phenomenon of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity, reflecting hyperacute autonomic dysfunction, is well-documented after msTBI. Limited animal and human studies, using experimental measures, have found evidence for autonomic dysfunction after msTBI. However, no studies have investigated the range and type of autonomic symptoms and autonomic dysfunction existing in msTBI.We set out to investigate the presence and type of subjective and objective autonomic dysfunction in msTBI.Methods We conducted two cohort studies. Cohort 1 comprises msTBI patients prospectively recruited from a national TBI outpatient clinic, in whom we assessed burden of autonomic symptoms using the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS31) autonomic symptom questionnaire. Cohort 2 comprises msTBI patients who had standard clinical autonomic function testing (supine/tilted catecholamine levels, head-up tilt, Valsalva manoeuvre, respiratory sinus arrhythmia assessment), retrospectively identified from the database of a regional clinical autonomic unit.Results Cohort 1 comprises 29 msTBI patients (6 females, median age 40 years, range 19-76), with a median time since injury of 19 months (range 4-105). There was multi-domain symptom burden, with all but 3 patients reporting symptoms on the COMPASS31 questionnaire, and 17/29 reporting symptoms in 3+ domains. The most commonly reported symptoms were gastrointestinal (22/29), followed by orthostatic (17/29), pupillomotor (14/29), secretomotor (14/29), bladder (12/29) and, least commonly, vasomotor (6/29). Cohort 2 comprises 18 msTBI patients (7 females, median age 44 years, range 21-64), with a median time between injury and testing of 57.5 months (range: 2-416). The majority of patients (15/18) had orthostatic symptoms as part of the reason for referral. Clinical autonomic function testing revealed a broad spectrum of autonomic dysfunction: 3/18 had evidence of sympathetic dysfunction, 10/18 had evidence of parasympathetic dysfunction, of which 6 also had evidence of mixed dysfunction.Discussion Our results provide evidence for clinically relevant autonomic dysfunction after moderate-severe TBI at the chronic stage. Our study advocates for routine enquiry about potential autonomic symptoms in this population, and the utility of formal clinical autonomic testing in providing diagnoses.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementLML is funded by an NIHR Clinical Lectureship.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:National Research Ethics Service (NRES) Committee London Camberwell St Giles, IRAS ID: 230221All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRaw scores from the COMPASS31 questionnaire and clinical autonomic function testing reports from the retrospective cohort are available on request to the corresponding author.