PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Preston, Nick
AU  - Parkin, Amy
AU  - Makower, Sophie
AU  - Ross, Denise H
AU  - Gee, Jeremy
AU  - Halpin, Stephen J
AU  - Horton, Mike C
AU  - O’Connor, Rory J
AU  - Sivan, Manoj
TI  - The COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRS): application and psychometric analysis in a post-COVID-19 syndrome cohort
AID  - 10.1101/2021.06.28.21259613
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.06.28.21259613
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/30/2021.06.28.21259613.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/30/2021.06.28.21259613.full
AB  - Background As our understanding of the nature and prevalence of Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) is increasing, a measure of the impact of COVID-19 could provide valuable insights into patients’ perceptions in clinical trials and epidemiological studies, as well as routine clinical practice.Objective To evaluate the clinical usefulness and psychometric properties of the COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRS) in patients with PCS.Design A prospective, observational study of 187 consecutive patients attending a post-COVID-19 rehabilitation clinic. The C19-YRS was used to record patients’ symptoms, functioning and disability. A global health question was used to measure the overall impact of PCS on health. Classical psychometric methods (data quality, scaling assumptions, targeting, reliability and validity) were used to assess the C19-YRS.Results For the overall scale, missing data were low, scaling and targeting assumptions were satisfied, and internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.891). Relationships between perception of health and patients’ reports of symptoms, functioning and disability demonstrated good concordance.Conclusions This is the first study to examine the psychometric properties of an outcome measure in patients with PCS. In this sample of patients, the C19-YRS was clinically useful and satisfied standard psychometric criteria, providing preliminary evidence of its suitability as a measure of PCS.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work is supported by a University of Leeds Medical Research Council (MRC) Confidence in Concept (CiC) grant and by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) infrastructure at Leeds and Sheffield.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for secondary analysis of anonymized data was obtained (University of Leeds Research Ethics Committee (School of Medicine, MREC 20-041))All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesUnavailable https://www.unavailable