PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - de Rooij, Myrna M.T. AU - Sikkema, Reina S. AU - Bouwknegt, Martijn AU - de Geus, Yvette AU - Stanoeva, Kamelia R. AU - Nieuwenweg, Sigrid AU - van Dam, A.S.G. (Sandra) AU - Raben, Ceder AU - Dohmen, Wietske AU - Heederik, Dick AU - Reusken, Chantal AU - Meijer, Adam AU - Koopmans, Marion P.G. AU - Franz, Eelco AU - Smit, Lidwien A.M. TI - Potential environmental transmission routes of SARS-CoV-2 inside a large meat processing plant experiencing COVID-19 clusters AID - 10.1101/2021.06.20.21259212 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.06.20.21259212 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/25/2021.06.20.21259212.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/25/2021.06.20.21259212.full AB - Worldwide exceptionally many COVID-19 clusters were observed in meat processing plants. Many contributing factors, promoting transmission, were suggested, including climate conditions in cooled production rooms favorable for environmental transmission but actual sampling studies are lacking. We aimed to assess SARS-CoV-2 contamination of air and surfaces to gain insight in potential environmental transmission in a large Dutch meat processing plant experiencing COVID-19 clusters.We performed SARS-CoV-2 screening of workers operating in cooled production rooms and intensive environmental sampling during a two-week study period in June 2020. Sampling of air (both stationary and personal), settling dust, ventilation systems, and sewage was performed. Swabs were collected from high-touch surfaces and workers’ hands. Screening of workers was done using oronasopharyngeal swabs. Samples were tested for presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by RT-qPCR.Of the 76 (predominantly asymptomatic) workers tested, 27 (35.5%) were SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive with modest to low viral loads (Ct≥29.7). In total, 6 out of 203 surface swabs were positive (Ct ≥38), being swabs taken from communal touchscreens/handles. One of the 12 personal air samples and one of the 4 sewage samples were positive, RNA levels were low (Ct≥38). All other environmental samples tested negative.Although one-third of workers tested SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive, environmental contamination was limited. Hence widespread transmission of SARS-CoV-2 via air and surfaces was considered unlikely within this plant at the time of investigation in the context of strict COVID-19 control measures in place.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementEnvironmental sampling and laboratory analysis of environmental samples was funded by Vion Food Group. This funder was not involved in analyses, data interpretation, nor the decision to publish. Oro-nasopharyngeal sampling of workers and laboratory analysis of human samples was funded by the Municipal health Services (GGD) and National Institute for Public Health (RIVM). KRS received fellowship funding by the European Public Health Microbiology Training Programme (EUPHEM), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) Utrecht confirmed that the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) did not apply to this study, and that therefore an official approval of this study by the MREC Utrecht was not required under the WMO (Protocol 20-385/C, reference number WAG/mb/20/021975).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.