RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The Impact of Legislation on Covid-19 Mortality in a Brazilian Federative Unit was Mediated by Social Isolation
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.06.16.21259057
DO 10.1101/2021.06.16.21259057
A1 Diaz-Quijano, Fredi A.
A1 Ribeiro, Tatiane Bomfim
A1 da Rosa, Aléxia Viana
A1 Reis, Rossana
A1 Aith, Fernando
A1 Ventura, Deisy F. L.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/24/2021.06.16.21259057.abstract
AB Background This study aimed to estimate the effect of restrictive laws on actual social isolation and COVID-19 mortality. Moreover, we evaluated how community adherence, measured with an index of social isolation, would mediate the lockdown effect on COVID-19 mortality.Methods This ecological study assessed the legislations published until June 30, 2020, in the Brazilian state of Ceará. We performed a systematic review and classification of restrictive norms and estimated their immediate effect on social isolation, measured by an index based on mobile data, and the subsequent impact on COVID-19 mortality (three weeks later). A mediation analysis was performed to estimate the effect of rigid lockdown on mortality that was explained for effective social isolation.Results The social isolation index showed an increase of 11.9% (95% CI: 2.9% - 21%) during the days in which a rigid isolation norm (lockdown) was implemented. Moreover, this rigid lockdown was associated with a reduction of 26% (95% CI: 21% - 31%) in the three-week-delayed mortality. We also calculated that the rigid lockdown had the indirect effect, i.e., mediated by adherence to social isolation, of reducing COVID-19 mortality by 38.24% (95% CI: 21.64% to 56.07%). Therefore, the preventive effect of this norm was fully explained by the actual population adherence, reflected in the social isolation index. On the other hand, mandatory mask use was associated with 11% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (95% CI: 8% −13%).Conclusions We estimated the effect of quarantine regulations on social isolation and evidenced that a rigid lockdown law led to a reduction of COVID-19 mortality in one state of Brazil. In addition, the mandatory masks norm was an additional determinant of the reduction of this outcome.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementCONECTAS Human Rigths [Direitos Humanos], agreement 01/2020. National Council of State Secretaries of Health [Conselho Nacional de Secretarios Estaduais de Saude: Conass], process 080/2020, contract 044/2020. FADQ was granted a fellowship for research productivity from the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), process/contract identification: 312656/2019-0.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:According to the Brazilian National Health Council [Conselho Nacional de Saude], research using secondary official and public data does not need an Ethics Committee evaluation (Resolution CNS 510/2016, Art. 1, II e III).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll the data analyzed are public.