RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Classification and Visualisation of Normal and Abnormal Radiographs; a comparison between Eleven Convolutional Neural Network Architectures
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.06.16.21259014
DO 10.1101/2021.06.16.21259014
A1 Ananda, Ananda
A1 Ngan, Kwun Ho
A1 Karabağ, Cefa
A1 Ter-Sarkisov, Aram
A1 Alonso, Eduardo
A1 Reyes-Aldasoro, Constantino Carlos
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/18/2021.06.16.21259014.abstract
AB This paper investigates the classification of radiographic images with eleven convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures (GoogleNet, VGG-19, AlexNet, SqueezeNet, ResNet-18, Inception-v3, ResNet-50, VGG-16, ResNet-101, DenseNet-201 and Inception-ResNet-v2). The CNNs were used to classify a series of wrist radiographs from the Stanford Musculoskeletal Radiographs (MURA) dataset into two classes - normal and abnormal. The architectures were compared for different hyper-parameters against accuracy and Cohen’s kappa coefficient. The best two results were then explored with data augmentation. Without the use of augmentation, the best results were provided by Inception-Resnet-v2 (Mean accuracy = 0.723, Mean kappa = 0.506). These were significantly improved with augmentation to Inception-Resnet-v2 (Mean accuracy = 0.857, Mean kappa = 0.703). Finally, Class Activation Mapping was applied to interpret activation of the network against the location of an anomaly in the radiographs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research received no external funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The institutional review board of Stanford University (as declared in http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.06957) approved study collected de-identified, HIPAA-compliant images from the Picture Archive and Communication System (PACS) of Stanford Hospital.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe dataset for this study is publicly available by request from Stanford Machine Learning Group at https://stanfordmlgroup.github.io/competitions/mura/ https://stanfordmlgroup.github.io/competitions/mura/ AcAccuracyA&EAccidents and EmergencyAIArtificial IntelligenceCAMClass Activation MappingCNNConvolutional Neural NetworkCTComputed TomographyILSVRCImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition ChallengeMUAManipulation under AnaesthesiaMURAMusculoskeletal RadiographsORIFOpen Reduction and Internal FixationReLURectified Linear Unit