RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients receiving antibiotic therapy JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2021.06.14.21255125 DO 10.1101/2021.06.14.21255125 A1 Yin, Yiwei A1 Tesoro, Eljim P A1 Gross, Alan E A1 Mucksavage, Jeffrey J YR 2021 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/15/2021.06.14.21255125.abstract AB Objective Antimicrobial prophylaxis is administered perioperatively to prevent surgical site infections. However, in patients who have already received antibiotics for the treatment of active infections prior to surgery, the risks and benefits of administering prophylactic antibiotics are unknown. We aimed to assess the necessity of perioperative prophylactic antibiotic administration in patients receiving antibiotic treatment for active infections.Method This was a retrospective, chart-review cohort study. Between January 2018 to May 2018, adult patients who underwent inpatient surgery at the University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, and were prescribed prophylactic antibiotics based on institutional protocol, while receiving antibiotic treatment within 48 hours prior to surgery, were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the rate of duplicative antibiotic therapy, which was defined as the administered prophylactic antibiotic (1) exhibiting similar or narrower bacterial coverage as the treatment antibiotic(s), and (2) given within the dose interval of the treatment antibiotic(s).Results A total of 158 patients were included in the study, of which 70 (44.3%) received duplicative antibiotic therapy, whereas 88 (55.7%) did not. Differences in the incidence of acute kidney injury, C. difficile infection, and surgery site infections were not statistically significant between the two groups.Conclusion We found that it was common for patients receiving therapeutic systematic antibiotics to perioperatively be prescribed additional prophylactic antibiotics at our institution. However, additional prophylactic antibiotics can be unnecessary in decreasing the incidence of surgical site infections but may increase the risk of adverse reaction.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis is a retrospective chart review study with IRB approval. informed consent was waivedFunding StatementThis research is not funded by any resourcesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research has been approved by the IRB of the University of Illinois at Chicago in 2019, as a retrospective chart review study, informed consent was waivedAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesN/A