PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Harrop, E.
AU  - Goss, S.
AU  - Farnell, D.
AU  - Longo, M.
AU  - Byrne, A.
AU  - Barawi, K.
AU  - Torrens-Burton, A.
AU  - Nelson, A.
AU  - Seddon, K.
AU  - Machin, L.
AU  - Sutton, E.
AU  - Roulston, A.
AU  - Finucane, A.
AU  - Penny, A.
AU  - Smith, K.V.
AU  - Sivell, S.
AU  - Selman, L.E.
TI  - Support needs and barriers to accessing support: Baseline results of a mixed-methods national survey of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic
AID  - 10.1101/2021.06.11.21258575
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.06.11.21258575
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/14/2021.06.11.21258575.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/14/2021.06.11.21258575.full
AB  - Background The COVID-19 pandemic is a mass bereavement event which has profoundly disrupted grief experiences. Understanding support needs and access to support among people bereaved at this time is crucial to ensuring appropriate bereavement support infrastructure.Aim To investigate grief experiences, support needs and use of formal and informal bereavement support among people bereaved during the pandemic.Design Baseline results from a longitudinal survey. Support needs and experiences of accessing support are reported using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of free-text data.Setting/Participants 711 adults bereaved in the UK between March-December 2020, recruited via media, social media, national associations and community/charitable organisations.Results High-level needs for emotional support were identified. Most participants had not sought support from bereavement services (59%, n=422) or their GP (60%, n=428). Of participants who had sought such support, over half experienced difficulties accessing bereavement services (56%, n=149)/GP support (52%, n=135). 51% reported high/severe vulnerability in grief; among these, 74% were not accessing bereavement or mental-health services. Barriers included limited availability, lack of appropriate support, discomfort asking for help, and not knowing how to access services. 39% (n=279) experienced difficulties getting support from family/friends, including relational challenges, little face-to-face contact, and disrupted collective mourning. The perceived uniqueness of pandemic bereavement and wider societal strains exacerbated their isolation.Conclusions People bereaved during the pandemic have high levels of support needs alongside difficulties accessing support. We recommend increased provision and tailoring of bereavement services, improved information on support options, and social/educational initiatives to bolster informal support and ameliorate isolation.What is already known about the topic?– Features of pandemic bereavement, such as traumatic death experiences, exacerbate family distress and add to the complexity of grief.– In pre-pandemic times most people mainly relied on the informal support of friends and family to cope with their bereavement, but an estimated 40% required more formal therapeutic support from bereavement or mental health services.– Bereaved people experience difficulties getting the support that they need from bereavement services and their social networks.What this paper adds– Participants had high level needs for emotional support, especially dealing with/expressing feelings, with 51% experiencing high or severe vulnerability in grief; however, 74% of this group were not accessing formal bereavement service or mental health support.– Most participants had not tried to access bereavement services, for reasons such as lack of appropriate support, discomfort in asking for help and uncertainty of how to access services; of the 41% who tried, 56% experienced difficulties such as long waiting lists or ineligibility.– A substantial proportion of people (39%) reported difficulties accessing support from friends and family; reduced in-person contact affected the perceived quality of support and disrupted collective mourning practices, whilst the wider social difficulties of the pandemic compounded feelings of isolation.Implications for policy and practice– Further investment in the provision of tailored bereavement support is needed to meet the diverse needs and backgrounds of bereaved people, including support that is culturally and crisis/context competent, and group-based support for those with shared experiences and characteristics.– To raise awareness of support options, information on grief and bereavement services should be provided proactively following a death and made available in online and community settings, with GPs and other primary care providers better resourced to signpost to appropriate support.– Following compassionate communities approaches, expanded provision of informal community-based support and activities could help with isolation, whilst longer-term educational and societal initiatives are needed to bolster community support for people experiencing death, dying and bereavement.Competing Interest StatementAll authors except AP declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article. AP declared a potential financial interest relating to lobbying by the Childhood Bereavement Network and National Bereavement Alliance for additional financial support for the bereavement sector.Funding StatementThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by the UKRI/ESRC (Grant No. ES/V012053/1). The project was also supported by the Marie Curie core grant funding to the Marie Curie Research Centre, Cardiff University (grant no. MCCC-FCO-11-C). E.H., A.N., A.B., S.S. and M.L. posts are supported by the Marie Curie core grant funding (grant no. MCCC-FCO-11-C). ATB is funded by Welsh Government through Health and Care Research Wales. K.V.S. is funded by the Medical Research Council (MR/V001841/1).The funder was not involved in the study design, implementation, analysis or interpretation of results, and has not contributed to this manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol and supporting documentation was approved by Cardiff University School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (SMREC 20/59).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesFull study data sets will be made available following study closure in February 2022. Data sharing requests will be considered prior to this and should be directed to Dr Emily Harrop, harrope{at}cardiff.ac.uk