RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Auditory tests for characterizing hearing deficits in listeners with various hearing abilities: The BEAR test battery
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.02.17.20021949
DO 10.1101/2020.02.17.20021949
A1 Sanchez-Lopez, Raul
A1 Nielsen, Silje Grini
A1 El-Haj-Ali, Mouhamad
A1 Bianchi, Federica
A1 Fereczkowski, Michal
A1 Cañete, Oscar M
A1 Wu, Mengfan
A1 Neher, Tobias
A1 Dau, Torsten
A1 Santurette, Sébastien
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/12/2020.02.17.20021949.abstract
AB The Better hEAring Rehabilitation (BEAR) project aims to provide a new clinical profiling tool – a test battery – for hearing loss characterization. Whereas the loss of sensitivity can be efficiently measured using pure-tone audiometry, the assessment of supra-threshold hearing deficits remains a challenge. In contrast to the classical ‘attenuation-distortion’ model, the proposed BEAR approach is based on the hypothesis that the hearing abilities of a given listener can be characterized along two dimensions, reflecting independent types of perceptual deficits (distortions). A data-driven approach provided evidence for the existence of different auditory profiles with different degrees of distortions. Ten tests were included in a test battery, based on their clinical feasibility, time efficiency and related evidence from the literature. The tests were divided into six categories: audibility, speech perception, binaural processing abilities, loudness perception, spectro-temporal modulation sensitivity and spectro-temporal resolution. Seventy-five listeners with symmetric, mild-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss were selected from a clinical population. The analysis of the results showed interrelations among outcomes related to high-frequency processing and outcome measures related to low-frequency processing abilities. The results showed the ability of the tests to reveal differences among individuals and their potential use in clinical settings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by Innovation Fund Denmark Grand Solutions 5164-00011B (Better hEAring Rehabilitation project), Oticon, GN Resound, Widex and other partners (Aalborg University, University of Southern Denmark, the Technical University of Denmark, Force, Aalborg, Odense and Copenhagen University Hospitals).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Zenodo at http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3459579. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3459579