RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.06.09.21256585
DO 10.1101/2021.06.09.21256585
A1 Vera San Juan, Norha
A1 Oram, Sian
A1 Pinfold, Vanessa
A1 Temple, Rachel
A1 Foye, Una
A1 Simpson, Alan
A1 Johnson, Sonia
A1 Hardt, Selina
A1 Abdinasir, Kadra
A1 Edbrooke-Childs, Julian
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/09/2021.06.09.21256585.abstract
AB This study aimed to identify research priorities for future research on screen use and adolescent mental health, from the perspectives of young people, parents/carers, and teachers.Methods The study design was informed by the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership approach. A three-stage consensus-based process of consultation to identify research priorities using qualitative and quantitative methods. Research was guided by a steering group comprising researchers, third sector partners, clinicians, parents/carers and young people. A Young People’s Advisory Group contributed at each stage.Results Initial steps generated 26 research questions of importance to children and young people; these were ranked by 357 participants (229 children and young people and 128 adults). Consensus was reached for the prioritization of four topics for future research: (i) the impact of exposure to adult content on young people’s mental health and relationships; (ii) the relationship between screen use and the wellbeing of young people from vulnerable groups; (iii) the impact of screen use on brain development; and (iv) the relationship between screen use and sleep.Additionally, young participants prioritized questions about online bullying, advertisements targeting young people, and the relationship between social media and specific mental health conditions. Research topics of interest arising specifically during the pandemic included the effects on adolescent mental health of exposure to constant news updates and online racial bias, and how young people take part in activism onlineConclusion These findings will enable researchers and funders to conduct research that is needs-oriented and relevant to the target audience.Key points and relevance of the studyKey points and relevance of the study▪ Evidence about the effects of screen use on adolescent mental health is weak and has been driven by researchers and technology developers.▪ Young people, parents and teachers prioritized research questions about exposure to adult content online; wellbeing of vulnerable populations; impact of screen use on development; and relation of screen use with sleep.▪ Young people additionally prioritized research questions related to social media and developing specific mental disorders, online bullying, and companies exploiting adolescents’ vulnerabilities (for example through targeted publicity).▪ Findings should inform calls for research and funding allocation in order to develop evidence-based policy and guidelines about screen use.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe project is commissioned and funded by the National Institute for Health Research Policy Research Program. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, the Department of Health and Social Care or its arm’s length bodies, and other Government Departments. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University College London research ethics committee approved this study (Project ID: 14037/001).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. Further information can be requested by contacting the corresponding author.YPAGYoung People Advisory GroupRADaRRigorous and Accelerated Data Reduction technique