PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Skowronski, Danuta M AU - Setayeshgar, Solmaz AU - Zou, Macy AU - Prystajecky, Natalie AU - Tyson, John R AU - Galanis, Eleni AU - Naus, Monika AU - Patrick, David M AU - Sbihi, Hind AU - Adam, Shiraz El AU - Henry, Bonnie AU - Hoang, Linda M N AU - Sadarangani, Manish AU - Jassem, Agatha N AU - Krajden, Mel TI - Single-dose mRNA vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2, including P.1 and B.1.1.7 variants: a test-negative design in adults 70 years and older in British Columbia, Canada AID - 10.1101/2021.06.07.21258332 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.06.07.21258332 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/09/2021.06.07.21258332.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/09/2021.06.07.21258332.full AB - Introduction Randomized-controlled trials of mRNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 included relatively few elderly participants. We assess singe-dose mRNA vaccine effectiveness (VE) in adults ≥70-years-old in British Columbia (BC), Canada where the second dose was deferred by up to 16 weeks and where a spring 2021 wave uniquely included co-dominant circulation of B.1.1.7 and P.1 variants of concern (VOC).Methods Analyses included community-dwelling adults ≥70-years-old with specimen collection between April 4 (epidemiological week 14) and May 1 (week 17). Adjusted VE was estimated by test-negative design through provincial laboratory and immunization data linkage. Cases were RT-PCR test-positive for SARS-CoV-2 and controls were test-negative. Vaccine status was defined by receipt of a single-dose ≥21 days before specimen collection, but a range of intervals was assessed. In variant-specific analyses, test-positive cases were restricted to those genetically-characterized as B.1.1.7, P.1 or non-VOC.Results VE analyses included 16,993 specimens: 1,226 (7.2%) test-positive cases and 15,767 test-negative controls. Of 1,131 (92%) viruses genetically categorized, 509 (45%), 314 (28%) and 276 (24%) were B.1.1.7, P.1 and non-VOC lineages, respectively. VE was negligible at 14% (95% CI 0-26) during the period 0-13 days post-vaccination but increased from 43% (95% CI 30-53) at 14-20 days to 75% (95% CI 63-83) at 35-41 days post-vaccination. VE at ≥21 days was 65% (95% CI 58-71) overall: 72% (95% CI 58-81), 67% (95% CI 57-75) and 61% (95% CI 45-72) for non-VOC, B.1.1.7 and P.1, respectively.Conclusions A single dose of mRNA vaccine reduced the risk of SARS-CoV-2 in adults ≥70-years-old by about two-thirds, with protection only minimally reduced against B.1.1.7 and P.1 variants. Substantial single-dose protection in older adults reinforces the option to defer the second dose when vaccine supply is scarce and broader first-dose coverage is needed.Competing Interest StatementDMS is Principal Investigator on grants from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research in support of this work. MK received grants/contracts paid to his institution from Roche, Hologic and Siemens, unrelated to this work. MS is supported via salary awards from the BC Childrens Hospital Foundation, the Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. MS has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, Seqirus, Symvivo and VBI Vaccines. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments. No other authors have conflicts of interest to disclose.Clinical TrialNot applicableFunding StatementFunding was provided in part by the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Data linkages and analyses were conducted under a surveillance mandate, authorized by the Provincial Health Officer under the Public Health Act, and exempt from research ethics review as waived by the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesTo the extent they comply with relevant privacy legislation, data sharing will be considered upon request.