PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Meyer, Stephanie
AU  - Cignacco, Eva
AU  - Monteverde, Settimio
AU  - Trachsel, Manuel
AU  - Raio, Luigi
AU  - Oelhafen, Stephan
TI  - “We felt like part of a production system”: a qualitative study on women’s experience of mistreatment during childbirth in Switzerland
AID  - 10.1101/2021.06.07.21258295
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.06.07.21258295
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/08/2021.06.07.21258295.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/08/2021.06.07.21258295.full
AB  - Introduction Mistreatment during childbirth is an issue of global magnitude that not only violates fundamental human rights but also seriously impacts women’s well-being. The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of the phenomenon by exploring the individual experiences of women who reported mistreatment during childbirth in Switzerland.Materials and Methods This project used a mixed methods approach to investigate women’s experiences of mistreatment during childbirth in general and informal coercion specifically: the present qualitative study expands on the findings from a nationwide online survey on childbirth experience. It combines inductive with theory-guided thematic analysis to study the 7753 comments women wrote in the survey and the subsequent interviews with 11 women who reported being mistreated during childbirth.Results The women described a wide range of experiences of mistreatment during childbirth in both the survey comments and the interviews. Out of all survey participants who wrote at least one comment (n = 3547), 28% described one or more experiences of mistreatment. Six of the seven types of mistreatment listed in Bohren and colleagues’ typology of mistreatment during childbirth were found, the most frequent of which were ineffective communication and lack of informed consent. Five further themes were identified in the interviews: informal coercion, risk factors for mistreatment, consequences of mistreatment, examples of good care, and what’s needed to improve maternity care.Conclusion The findings from this study show that experiences of mistreatment are a reality in Swiss maternity care and give insight into women’s individual experiences as well as how these affect them during and after childbirth. This study emphasises the need to respect women’s autonomy in order to prevent mistreatment and empower women to actively participate in decisions. Both individual and systemic efforts are required to prevent mistreatment and guarantee respectful, dignified, and high-quality maternity care for all.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementSO received funding from the Käthe-Zingg-Schwichtenberg-Fund of the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (SAMS) (grant number KZS 13/18) and from the Lindenhof Foundation Bern Research & Teaching Fund (grant number 19-05-F). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Because this was a national study, all seven regional ethics committees in Switzerland confirmed that by the Swiss Human Research Act, the current study did not require ethical approval (Req-2019-00116).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data cannot be shared publicly because they contain sensitive information and could allow individuals to be identified. When consenting to participate in the study, the women were guaranteed that anonymity and confidentiality would be strictly maintained and that only the researchers involved in the project would have access to the data collected. Data may be made available upon reasonable request. For requests please contact: stephan.oelhafen{at}bfh.ch.