RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Revealing public opinion towards COVID-19 vaccines with Twitter Data in the United States: a spatiotemporal perspective
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.06.02.21258233
DO 10.1101/2021.06.02.21258233
A1 Hu, Tao
A1 Wang, Siqin
A1 Luo, Wei
A1 Zhang, Mengxi
A1 Huang, Xiao
A1 Yan, Yingwei
A1 Liu, Regina
A1 Ly, Kelly
A1 Kacker, Viraj
A1 She, Bing
A1 Li, Zhenlong
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/07/2021.06.02.21258233.abstract
AB Background The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed a large, initially uncontrollable, public health crisis both in the US and across the world, with experts looking to vaccines as the ultimate mechanism of defense. The development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been rapidly advancing via global efforts. Hence, it is crucial for governments, public health officials, and policy makers to understand public attitudes and opinions towards vaccines, such that effective interventions and educational campaigns can be designed to promote vaccine acceptance.Objective The aim of this study is to investigate public opinion and perception on COVID-19 vaccines by investigating the spatiotemporal trends of their sentiment and emotion towards vaccines, as well as how such trends relate to popular topics on Twitter in the US.Methods We collected over 300,000 geotagged tweets in the US from March 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021. We examined the spatiotemporal patterns of public sentiment and emotion over time at both national and state scales and identified three phases along the pandemic timeline with the significant changes of public sentiment and emotion, further linking to eleven key events and major topics as the potential drivers to induce such changes via cloud mapping of keywords and topic modelling.Results An increasing trend of positive sentiment in parallel with the decrease of negative sentiment are generally observed in most states, reflecting the rising confidence and anticipation of the public towards vaccines. The overall tendency of the eight types of emotion implies the trustiness and anticipation of the public to vaccination, accompanied by the mixture of fear, sadness and anger. Critical social/international events and/or the announcements of political leaders and authorities may have potential impacts on the public opinion on vaccines. These factors, along with important topics and manual reading of popular posts on eleven key events, help identify underlying themes and validate insights from the analysis.Conclusions The analyses of near real-time social media big data benefit public health authorities by enabling them to monitor public attitudes and opinions towards vaccine-related information in a geo-aware manner, address the concerns of vaccine skeptics and promote the confidence of individuals within a certain region or community, towards vaccines.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was partially funded by the National University of Singapore Start-up Grant under WBS R-109-000-270-133 awarded to WL, and NSF under Grant 1841403, 2027540, and 2028791. This research has also been partially supported by the Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences Staff Research Support Scheme FY2021 of National University of Singapore (WBS: C-109-000-222-091).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study is IRB exempt.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesUsers may contact the corresponding author to access the data.APIapplication programming interfaceGPSglobal positioning systemLDALatent Dirichlet AllocationNRCLexNational Research Council Canada LexiconSARS-CoV-2severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2VADERvalence aware dictionary for sentiment reasoningWHOWorld Health Organization