PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Kumar Singh, Awadhesh AU - Phatak, Sanjeev Ratnakar AU - Singh, Ritu AU - Bhattacharjee, Kingshuk AU - Singh, Nagendra Kumar AU - Gupta, Arvind AU - Sharma, Arvind TI - Antibody Response after Second-dose of ChAdOx1-nCOV (Covishield™<sup>®</sup>) and BBV-152 (Covaxin™<sup>®</sup>) among Health Care Workers in India: Final Results of Cross-sectional Coronavirus Vaccine-induced Antibody Titre (COVAT) study AID - 10.1101/2021.06.02.21258242 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.06.02.21258242 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/04/2021.06.02.21258242.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/04/2021.06.02.21258242.full AB - Background We assessed the humoral immune response after the completion of two doses of both ChAdOx1-nCOV (Covishield™) and BBV-152 (Covaxin™) vaccines in Indian health care workers (HCW).Method A Pan-India, Cross-sectional, Coronavirus Vaccine-induced Antibody Titre (COVAT) study was conducted that measured SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike binding antibody quantitatively, 21 days or more after the first and second dose of two vaccines in both severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) naïve and recovered HCW. Primary aim was to analyze antibody response (seropositivity rate and median [inter-quartile range, IQR] antibody titre) following each dose of both vaccines and its correlation to age, sex, blood group, body mass index (BMI) and comorbidities. Here we report the final results of anti-spike antibody response after the two completed doses.Results Among the 515 HCW (305 Male, 210 Female), 95.0% showed seropositivity after two doses of both vaccines. Of the 425 Covishield and 90 Covaxin recipients, 98.1% and 80.0% respectively, showed seropositivity. However, both seropositivity rate and median (IQR) rise in anti-spike antibody was significantly higher in Covishield vs. Covaxin recipient (98.1 vs. 80.0%; 127.0 vs. 53 AU/mL; both p&lt;0.001). This difference persisted in 457 SARS-CoV-2 naïve cohorts and propensity-matched (age, sex and BMI) analysis of 116 cohorts. While no difference was observed in relation to sex, BMI, blood group and any comorbidities; people with age &gt;60 years or those with type 2 diabetes had a significantly lower seropositivity rates. Both vaccine recipients had similar solicited mild to moderate adverse events and none had severe or unsolicited side effects. In SARS-CoV-2 naïve cohorts, sex, presence of comorbidities, and vaccine type were independent predictors of antibody positivity rate in multiple logistic regression analysis.Conclusions Both vaccines elicited good immune response after two doses, although seropositivity rates and median anti-spike antibody titre was significantly higher in Covishield compared to Covaxin arm.HighlightsThis study evaluated the humoral antibody response after 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine Covishield™ and Covaxin™ in Indian health-care workers.Combined results of both vaccines showed 95% seropositivity to anti-spike antibody, 21-36 days after the second completed dose.Seropositivity rates were higher in Covishield recipients compared to Covaxin in the propensity-matched analysis of SARS-CoV-2 naïve cohorts.Gender, presence of comorbidities and the type of vaccine received were independent predictors of antibody response after the second dose.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis is cross-sectional study and requirement of registration is not mandatory.Funding StatementNo funding received for this cross-sectional studyAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This cross-sectional study is approved by the ethical committee of Thakershy Charitable Trust, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll the authors are responsible for the originality of this study. Original data can be shared from first author, if necessary, after a reasonable request.