RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and its socio-demographic and emotional determinants: a multi-country cross-sectional study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.30.21258074
DO 10.1101/2021.05.30.21258074
A1 de Figueiredo, A.
A1 Simas, C.
A1 Larson, H. J.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/02/2021.05.30.21258074.abstract
AB Background Multiple COVID-19 vaccines have now been licensed for human use, with other candidate vaccines in different stages of development. Effective and safe vaccines against COVID-19 are essential to achieve global control of the pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but multiple factors, including vaccine supply and vaccine confidence, will be key for high rates of global uptake. Confidence in COVID-19 vaccines, socio-demographic status, and recent emotional status are likely to be key drivers of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. In this study, we explore these determinants of COVID-19 vaccination intent across17 countries worldwide.Methods In this large-scale multi-country study, we explore intent to accept a COVID-19 vaccine and the socio-demographic and emotional determinants of uptake for 17 countries and over 19,000 individuals surveyed in June and July 2020 via nationally representative samples. We used Bayesian ordinal logistic regressions to probe the relationship between intent to accept a COVID-19 vaccine and individuals’ socio-demographic status, their confidence in COVID-19 vaccines, and their recent emotional status. Gibbs sampling was used for Bayesian model inference, with 95% Bayesian highest posterior density intervals used to capture uncertainty.Findings Intent to accept a COVID-19 vaccine is highest in India, where 77.8% (95% HPD, 75.5 to 80.0%) of respondents strongly agreeing that they would take a new COVID-19 vaccine if it were available. The Democratic Republic of Congo (15.5%, 12.2 to 18.6%) and France (26.4%, 23.7 to 29.2%) have the lowest share of respondents who strongly agree that they would accept a COVID-19. Confidence in the safety, importance, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines are the most widely informative determinants of vaccination intent. Socio-demographic and emotional determinants played a lesser role, with being male and having higher education was associated with increased uptake intent in five countries and being fearful of catching COVID-19 also a strong determinant of uptake intent.Interpretation Barriers to COVID-19 vaccine acceptance will be highly country and context dependent. These findings highlight the importance of regular monitoring of COVID-19 vaccine confidence to identify groups less likely to vaccinate and to monitor the impact of vaccination policies on uptake behaviour.Competing Interest StatementHJL, CS, and AdF are involved in Vaccine Confidence Project collaborative grants with Janssen, GlaxoSmithKline and Merck. HJL has also received other support for participating in Merck meetings and GlaxoSmithKline advisory roundtables. HJL is a member of the Merck Vaccine Confidence Advisory Board.Funding StatementThis study was funded by Janssen.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for this study was granted by the LSHTM Ethics Committee on 15 June 2020 with reference 22130.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data used in the study can be provided upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.