RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine: Results from a population-based survey in Canada
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.03.21251007
DO 10.1101/2021.02.03.21251007
A1 Ogilvie, Gina S.
A1 Gordon, Shanlea
A1 Smith, Laurie W.
A1 Albert, Arianne
A1 Racey, C. Sarai
A1 Booth, Amy
A1 Gottschlich, Anna
A1 Goldfarb, David
A1 Murray, Melanie C.M.
A1 Galea, Liisa A.M.
A1 Kaida, Angela
A1 Brotto, Lori A.
A1 Sadarangani, Manish
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/01/2021.02.03.21251007.abstract
AB Background The success of any COVID-19 vaccine program ultimately depends on high vaccine uptake. This study determined overall intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine and identified factors that predict intentions to be vaccinated against COVID-19 in Canada, specifically in key priority groups identified by the American Committee on Immunization Practice (ACIP) and the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) for early immunization.Methods Individuals from research cohorts from the general population of British Columbia aged 25-69 were invited complete an online survey based on validated scales and theoretical frameworks to explore intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Two multivariable logistic regression models were conducted to determine factors associated with intention to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.Results Of 4,948 respondents, 79.8% intended to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. In multivariable modeling, respondents who intended to receive the vaccine had higher vaccine attitudinal scores (p <0.001), reported greater influence of direct social norms (p = 0.001), and indirect social norms, including their family physician (p = 0.024), and Provincial Health Officer (p = 0.011). Older individuals (>60 years) were more likely to intend to receive the vaccine, while females (95%CI 0.57,0.93), those with less than high school education (95%CI 0.5,0.76), those who self-identified as non-white (95%CI 0.60,0.92), self-identified as Indigenous (95%CI 0.36,0.84) and essential non-health care workers (95%CI 0.59,0.86) had lower adjusted odds of intending to receive a COVID-19 vaccine.Conclusions To optimize vaccine coverage, public health should focus on key messages around vaccine safety and benefit, and leverage trusted practitioners for messaging. As certain key populations identified by NACI and ACIP for early immunization report a lower intention to vaccinate, there is a need for in-depth education and support for these communities to ensure optimal uptake.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the BC Women's Foundation (Vancouver, British Columbia).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the University of British Columbia (UBC) Clinical Research Ethics Board (CREB). All methods included in the manuscript follow what was approved by the research ethics board, under application number: H20-01421.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available. At the time of consent participants were not advised that data might be made publicly available, and so we felt it was not appropriate to make the data publicly available. Aggregate data may be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.