PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Hart, W.S. AU - Abbott, S. AU - Endo, A. AU - Hellewell, J. AU - Miller, E. AU - Andrews, N. AU - Maini, P.K. AU - Funk, S. AU - Thompson, R.N. TI - Inference of SARS-CoV-2 generation times using UK household data AID - 10.1101/2021.05.27.21257936 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.05.27.21257936 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/30/2021.05.27.21257936.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/30/2021.05.27.21257936.full AB - The distribution of the generation time (the interval between individuals becoming infected and passing on the virus) characterises changes in the transmission risk during SARS-CoV-2 infections. Inferring the generation time distribution is essential to plan and assess public health measures. We previously developed a mechanistic approach for estimating the generation time, which provided an improved fit to SARS-CoV-2 data from January-March 2020 compared to existing models. However, few estimates of the generation time exist based on data from later in the pandemic. Here, using data from a household study conducted from March-November 2020 in the UK, we provide updated estimates of the generation time. We consider both a commonly used approach in which the transmission risk is assumed to be independent of when symptoms develop, and our mechanistic model in which transmission and symptoms are linked explicitly. Assuming independent transmission and symptoms, we estimated a mean generation time (4.2 days, 95% CrI 3.3-5.3 days) similar to previous estimates from other countries, but with a higher standard deviation (4.9 days, 3.0-8.3 days). Using our mechanistic approach, we estimated a longer mean generation time (6.0 days, 5.2-7.0 days) and a similar standard deviation (4.9 days, 4.0-6.3 days). Both models suggest a shorter mean generation time in September-November 2020 compared to earlier months. Since the SARS-CoV-2 generation time appears to be changing, continued data collection and analysis is necessary to inform future public health policy decisions.Competing Interest StatementAE received a research grant from Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. All the other authors declare no competing interests.Funding StatementWSH was funded by an EPSRC Excellence Award for his doctoral studies. AE received a research grant from Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The household study was approved by the PHE Research Ethics and Governance Group as part of the portfolio of PHE's enhanced surveillance activities in response to the pandemic.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData and code will be made publicly available upon publication, but are available upon request to the authors.