PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Newbronner, Elizabeth AU - Spanakis, Panagiotis AU - Wadman, Ruth AU - Crossland, Suzanne AU - Heron, Paul AU - Johnston, Gordon AU - Walker, Lauren AU - Gilbody, Simon AU - Peckham, Emily TI - Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions AID - 10.1101/2021.05.24.21257694 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.05.24.21257694 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/25/2021.05.24.21257694.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/25/2021.05.24.21257694.full AB - Aims To explore: how satisfied people with severe mental illness (SMI) are with the support received during the pandemic; understand any difficulties encountered when accessing both mental health and primary care services; consider ways to mitigate these difficulties; and assess the perceived need for future support from mental health services.Materials and Methods A representative sample was drawn from a large transdiagnostic clinical cohort of people with SMI, which was recruited between April 2016 and March 2020. The sample was re-surveyed a few months after the beginning of the restrictions. Descriptive frequency statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data. The free text responses were analysed thematically.Results 367 participants responded to the survey. Two thirds were receiving support from mental health services with the rest supported in primary care or self-managing. A quarter thought they would need more mental health support in the coming year. Half had needed to used community mental health services during the pandemic and the majority had been able to get support. A minority reported that their mental health had deteriorated but they had either not got the supported they wanted or had not sought help. The biggest service change was the reduction in face-to-face appointments and increasing use of phone and video call support. Nearly half of those using mental health services found this change acceptable or even preferred it; acceptability was influenced by several factors. Participants were more likely to be satisfied with support received when seen in person.Discussion Although most participants were satisfied with the mental health support they had received, a minority were not. This, couple with findings on future need for mental health support has implications for post pandemic demand on services. Remote care has brought benefits but also risks that it could increase inequalities in access to services.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study is supported by the MRC (grant reference MR/V028529), and links with the Closing the Gap Cohort which was part-funded by the Wellcome Trust [ref: 204829] through the Centre for Future Health (CFH) at the University of York, UKRI [ES/S004459/1], and the NIHR Yorkshire and Humberside Applied Research Collaboration (YHARC). Any views expressed here are those of the project investigators and do not necessarily represent the views of the MRC, Wellcome, UKRI, National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the North West Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee (reference 20/NW/0276).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll key data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. Additional information is available on request from the corresponding author.