RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Use of Environmental Variables to Predict SARS-CoV-2 Spread in the U.S.
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.19.21257350
DO 10.1101/2021.05.19.21257350
A1 Haring, R. Sterling
A1 Trende, Sean
A1 Ramirez, Christina M.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/21/2021.05.19.21257350.abstract
AB Background The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged even the most robust public health systems world-wide, leaving state and local health departments, hospitals, and physicians with little guidance on planning and resource allocation. Efforts at predicting the virus’ spread have largely failed to capture the nuances presented by national and local geographic, environmental, and sociological variables.Objective Using county-level data from the United States, we sought to measure the extent to which these demographic, geographic, and environmental variables correlate with the spread of COVID-19.Methods Using demographic data from the US Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, weather station data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and COVID-19 case data from the Center for Systems Science and Engineering at Johns Hopkins University and the New York State Department of Health, we employed Bayesian hierarchical modeling with zero-inflated Negative Binomial regression to calculate correlations between these variables, COVID-19 case count, and rate of viral spread. Key predictors were identified and measured during two periods of two weeks each: March and June of 2020. The resultant model was then employed to predict case counts and spread rate for early July 2020.Results While demographic and environmental factors explain viral spread well, our findings challenge earlier conclusions about how these factors related to viral progress. Using these factors alone, we were able to predict spread to within 1% in all but 8 counties (99.9%), and within 0.1% in all but 51 counties (98.4%). The model was subsequently able to predict early July viral spread to within 0.5% in 98% of counties. Contrary to earlier findings, temperature had variable effect; as Spring temperatures warmed, cases decreased, but Summer heat increased cases, likely reflecting movement of populations from indoors to outdoors and back in. States varied little in their case rate relative to the model, and much of the variation could be linked to known “superspreader” events.Conclusion While environmental and demographic variables can help predict COVID-19 spread rates, some relationships are variable in ways earlier research failed to identify.Role of Funding Source There was no funding supporting this work.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received for this project.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Exempt per Vanderbilt University Medical Center IRB guidelinesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data are publicly available, and references with links are provided in the manuscript.