RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Effectiveness of the CoronaVac vaccine in the elderly population during a P.1 variant-associated epidemic of COVID-19 in Brazil: A test-negative case-control study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.19.21257472
DO 10.1101/2021.05.19.21257472
A1 Ranzani, Otavio T.
A1 Hitchings, Matt
A1 Nieto, Murilo Dorion
A1 D’Agostini, Tatiana Lang
A1 de Paula, Regiane Cardoso
A1 de Paula, Olivia Ferreira Pereira
A1 de Moura Villela, Edlaine Faria
A1 Torres, Mario Sergio Scaramuzzini
A1 de Oliveira, Silvano Barbosa
A1 Schulz, Wade
A1 Almiron, Maria
A1 Said, Rodrigo
A1 de Oliveira, Roberto Dias
A1 da Silva, Patricia Vieira
A1 de Araújo, Wildo Navegantes
A1 Andrews, Jason R.
A1 Cummings, Derek A.T.
A1 Ko, Albert I.
A1 Croda, Julio
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/21/2021.05.19.21257472.abstract
AB Background Mass vaccination is being used in response to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemics, including those driven by emerging variants of concern. We evaluated the effectiveness of the inactivated whole-virus vaccine, CoronaVac, against symptomatic COVID-19 in the elderly population of São Paulo State, Brazil during widespread circulation of the P.1 variant.Methods We conducted a test-negative, case-control study of adults ≥70 years of age from São Paulo State from January 17 to April 29, 2021, during which vaccination with a two-dose regimen of CoronaVac was implemented. We identified RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases and controls who had a symptomatic illness with a negative RT-PCR test from national surveillance and state vaccination databases. Controls were pair-matched to cases by age category, sex, race, municipality, prior COVID-19 status, and date of RT-PCR testing. We estimated vaccine effectiveness, adjusted for age and comorbidities, using conditional logistic regression.Findings We selected 7,950 matched pairs with a mean age of 76 years from 26,433 COVID-19 cases and 17,622 test-negative controls. Adjusted vaccine effectiveness was 18.2% (95% CI, 0.0 to 33.2) and 41.6% (95% CI, 26.9 to 53.3) in the period 0-13 and ≥14 days, respectively, after the 2nd dose. Administration of a single vaccine dose was not associated with reduced odds of COVID-19. Vaccine effectiveness ≥14 days after the 2nd dose declined with increasing age and was 61.8% (95% CI 34.8 to 77.7), 48.9% (95% CI 23.3 to 66.0) and 28.0% (95% CI 0.6 to 47.9) among individuals 70-74, 75-79 and ≥80 years of age, respectively (pinteraction = 0.05).Interpretation CoronaVac was 42% effective in the real-world setting of extensive P.1 transmission, but significant protection was not observed until completion of the two-dose regimen. These findings underscore the need to maintain non-pharmaceutical interventions when mass vaccination with CoronaVac is used as part of an epidemic response.Funding Pan American Health OrganizationEvidence before this study We searched Pubmed for articles published from inception of the pandemic until May 10, 2021, with no language restrictions, using the search terms “vaccine”, “COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV-2”, “elderly”, “age”, “older”. There are no studies reporting the real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against P.1, and few studies reporting real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among elderly individuals.Added value of this study In a population based matched test-negative case-control study conducted in a setting with widespread P.1 variant transmission, we observed that two-doses of CoronaVac was effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 among those aged 70 years or older, a population remarkably underrepresented in phase 3 clinical trials. There was no evidence for protection after the first dose. We observed a significant decline in effectiveness at older ages.Implications of all the available evidence Our results showed that the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine CoronaVac likely needs the complete two-dose schedule for protection against symptomatic disease among the elderly. Additionally, effectiveness of the two-dose schedule decreased with age. These results have direct implications for national vaccination programs using CoronaVac, highlighting that non-pharmaceutical interventions should be in place throughout vaccination campaigns. Further research is needed on how to optimize the vaccination of the very elderly (≥80 years), considering different vaccine types or dosing schedules by age.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementWe are grateful for the Pan American Health Organization's support and the Sao Paulo State in making the databases available for analysis. JC and AS are supported by the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Edital Covid-19 - resposta rapida: 48111668950485). OTR is funded by a Sara Borrell fellowship (CD19/00110) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. OTR acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2019-2023 Program and from the Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA Program.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Ethical Committee for Research of Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (CAAE: 43289221.5.0000.0021).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDeidentified databases as well as the R codes will be deposited in the repository https://github.com/juliocroda/VebraCOVID-19