RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Interval timing and midfrontal delta oscillations are impaired in Parkinson’s disease patients with freezing of gait
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.18.21257273
DO 10.1101/2021.05.18.21257273
A1 Bosch, Taylor J.
A1 Barsainya, Richa
A1 Ridder, Andrew
A1 Santosh, KC
A1 Singh, Arun
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/18/2021.05.18.21257273.abstract
AB Gait abnormalities and cognitive dysfunction are common in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and get worst with disease progression. Recent evidence has suggested a strong relationship between gait abnormalities and cognitive dysfunction in PD patients and impaired cognitive control could be one of the causes for abnormal gait patterns. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms of cognitive dysfunction in PD patients with gait problems are unclear. Here, we collected scalp electroencephalography (EEG) signals during a 7-second interval timing task to investigate the cortical mechanisms of cognitive dysfunction in PD patients with (PDFOG+, n=34) and without (PDFOG–, n=37) freezing of gait, as well as control subjects (n=37). Results showed that the PDFOG+ group exhibited the lowest maximum response density at around 7 seconds compared to PDFOG– and control groups, and this response density peak correlated with gait abnormalities as measured by FOG scores. EEG data demonstrated that PDFOG+ had decreased midfrontal delta-band power at the onset of the target cue, which was also correlated with maximum response density and FOG scores. In addition, our classifier performed better at discriminating PDFOG+ from PDFOG– and controls with an area under the curve of 0.93 when midfrontal delta power was chosen as a feature. These findings suggest that abnormal midfrontal activity in PDFOG+ is related to cognitive dysfunction and describe the mechanistic relationship between cognitive and gait functions in PDFOG+. Overall, these results could advance the development of novel biosignatures and brain stimulation approaches for PDFOG+.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementCBBReAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The local ethics committee of the University of South Dakota approved the study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData and analyses codes will be available on reasonable request.