RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Irremediable psychiatric suffering in the context of medical assistance in dying: a qualitative study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.15.21257262
DO 10.1101/2021.05.15.21257262
A1 van Veen, Sisco M.P.
A1 Ruissen, Andrea M.
A1 Beekman, Aartjan T.F.
A1 Evans, Natalie
A1 Widdershoven, Guy A.M.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/17/2021.05.15.21257262.abstract
AB Background Establishing irremediability is a central challenge in determining the appropriateness of medical assistance in dying (MAID) for patients with a psychiatric disorder. The objective of this study is to learn how experienced psychiatrists define irremediable psychiatric suffering (IPS) in the context of MAID and what challenges they face while establishing IPS.Methods In a qualitative study, we performed 11 in-depth interviews with psychiatrists who have experience assessing IPS in the context of MAID.Results Although determining IPS is, essentially, a prospective assessment, psychiatrists mostly rely on retrospective dimensions, such as the history of failed treatments, when defining IPS. When establishing IPS, psychiatrists face diagnosis and treatment challenges. The main challenge regarding diagnosis is that patients requesting MAID are often diagnosed with more than one psychiatric disorder. Important treatment related challenges are: assessing the quality of past treatments, establishing the limits of approaches that aim to alter the patient’s perception, and managing ‘treatment fatigue’ and treatment refusal.Interpretation IPS is mostly defined in terms of failed past treatments. Challenges regarding diagnosis and treatment complicate the process of establishing IPS. The finding that most patients are diagnosed with more than one psychiatric disorder calls for a critical appraisal of the due diligence procedure for MAID. In response to the challenges related to treatment, intersubjective clinical criteria for IPS in the context of MAID should be developed. Also, further investigation of the concept of ‘treatment fatigue’ in psychiatry may provide insight into why patients requesting MAID.Registration this study was preregistered under osf.io/2jrnd.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://www.osf.io/2jrnd Funding StatementNo funding was received for this project.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the VU Medical Centre Amsterdam (2018.661).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe qualitative data (interviews) and coding is available upon request (in Dutch).