RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Variant that Affects Antigen Test Performance
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.05.21256527
DO 10.1101/2021.05.05.21256527
A1 Lori Bourassa
A1 Garrett A. Perchetti
A1 Quynh Phung
A1 Michelle J. Lin
A1 Margaret G. Mills
A1 Pavitra Roychoudhury
A1 Kimberly G. Harmon
A1 Jonathan C. Reed
A1 Alexander L. Greninger
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/05/2021.05.05.21256527.abstract
AB More than one year into a global pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 is now defined by a variety of rapidly evolving variant lineages. Several FDA authorized molecular diagnostic tests have been impacted by viral variation, while no reports of viral variation affecting antigen test performance have occurred to date. While determining the analytical sensitivity of the Quidel Sofia SARS Antigen FIA test (Sofia 2), we uncovered a high viral load specimen that repeatedly tested negative by this antigen test. Whole genome sequencing of the specimen uncovered two mutations, T205I and D399N, present in the nucleocapsid protein of the isolate. All six SARS-CoV-2 positive clinical specimens available in our laboratory with a D399N nucleocapsid mutation and CT < 31 were not detected by the Sofia 2 but detected by the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card, while clinical specimens with the T205I mutation were detected by both assays. Testing of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid with these variants demonstrated an approximate 1000-fold loss in sensitivity for the Quidel Sofia SARS Antigen FIA test associated with the D399N mutation, while the BinaxNOW and Quidel Quickvue SARS Antigen tests were unaffected by the mutation. The D399N nucleocapsid mutation has been relatively uncommon to date, appearing in only 0.02% of genomes worldwide at time of writing. Our results demonstrate how routine pathogen genomics can be integrated into the clinical microbiology laboratory to investigate diagnostic edge cases, as well as the importance of profiling antigenic diversity outside of the spike protein for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics.Competing Interest StatementThe authors thank the staff of UW Virology as well as financial support from the Chisholm Foundation, and Quidel and Abbott for providing in-kind kits for testing. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. ALG reports contract testing from Abbott and research support from Merck and Gilead.Funding StatementThe authors thank the staff of UW Virology as well as financial support from the Chisholm Foundation, and Quidel and Abbott for providing in-kind kits for testing. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:UW IRB approved studyAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesTesting data available in tables and from GISAID.