RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Modeling and Predicting Antibody Durability for mRNA-1273 Vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 Variants
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.04.21256537
DO 10.1101/2021.05.04.21256537
A1 Luo, George
A1 Hu, Zhongbo
A1 Letterio, John J.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/04/2021.05.04.21256537.abstract
AB Recently, the antibody titer levels have been followed in 33 adults who received the mRNA-1273 vaccine for 6 months. With single dose estimated effectiveness of 92.1%, we combine this knowledge with corresponding antibody levels to model and estimate the long-term durability of mRNA-1273 vaccine. Additionally, we integrate studies about differences in antibody neutralization to SARS-CoV-2 variants to understand how variants can affect the durability of the vaccine.The estimated days after first injection for binding antibodies to fall below levels of those from day 15 is 411 days. The estimated days after first injection to fall below the lower limit of detection of 20 GMTs is 327 days for pseudovirus neutralization and 461 days for live virus neutralization. Our model has pseudovirus neutralization against variant B.1.351 falling below 20 GMT on day 100; variant P.1 on day 202, variant B.1.429 on day 258; and variant B.1.1.7 on day 309.The data used contains many limitations including the small sample size with older age bias, sensitivity of the neutralization assays, and limited data on variants. Still, we believe mRNA-1273 two dose vaccine can provide over a year of protection against COVID-19 from the initial D614G variant. It is likely by the second year, protection against COVID-19 will fall below single dose efficacy. Therefore, there should be consideration for a booster shot a year after the first set of vaccines. If there is an observed increase in variants with higher resistance such as B.1.351 and P.1, a booster vaccine against the newer variants should be considered to increase protection against resistant variants.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding source contributed to this studyAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study falls under one of the IRB exempt categories: it is research involving existing data which is publicly available, has been used in other studies published on journals, and has anonymized entries.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available through supplemental document.