RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Use of U.S. Blood Donors for National Serosurveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies: Basis for an Expanded National Donor Serosurveillance Program
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.01.21255576
DO 10.1101/2021.05.01.21255576
A1 Stone, Mars
A1 Germanio, Clara Di
A1 Wright, David J.
A1 Sulaeman, Hasan
A1 Dave, Honey
A1 Fink, Rebecca V.
A1 Notari, Edward P.
A1 Green, Valerie
A1 Strauss, Donna
A1 Kessler, Debra
A1 Destree, Mark
A1 Saa, Paula
A1 Williamson, Phillip C.
A1 Simmons, Graham
A1 Stramer, Susan L.
A1 Opsomer, Jean
A1 Jones, Jefferson M.
A1 Kleinman, Steven
A1 Busch, Michael P.
A1 ,
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/03/2021.05.01.21255576.abstract
AB Introduction The REDS-IV-P Epidemiology, Surveillance and Preparedness of the Novel SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic (RESPONSE) seroprevalence study conducted monthly cross-sectional testing for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies on blood donors in six U.S. metropolitan regions to estimate the extent of SARS-COV-2 infections over time.Study Design/Methods During March-August 2020, approximately ≥1,000 serum specimens were collected monthly from each region and tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using a well-validated algorithm. Regional seroprevalence estimates were weighted based on demographic differences with the general population. Seroprevalence was compared with reported COVID-19 case rates over time.Results/Findings For all regions, seroprevalence was <1.0% in March 2020. New York experienced the biggest increase (peak seroprevalence, 15.8 % in May). All other regions experienced modest increases in seroprevalence(1-2% in May-June to 2-4% in July-August). Seroprevalence was higher in younger, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic donors. Temporal increases in donor seroprevalence correlated with reported case rates in each region. In August, 1.3-5.6 estimated cumulative infections (based on seroprevalence data) per COVID-19 case reported to CDC.Conclusion Increases in seroprevalence were found in all regions, with the largest increase in New York. Seroprevalence was higher in non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic blood donors than in non-Hispanic White blood donors. SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing of blood donor samples can be used to estimate the seroprevalence in the general population by region and demographic group. The methods derived from the RESPONSE seroprevalence study served as the basis for expanding SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence surveillance to all 50 states and Puerto Rico.Summary SARS-CoV-2 serosurveillance data from blood donors in 6 US regions were used to estimate population weighted seroprevalence. Seroprevelance rates were higher in case rates. The study was expanded to a national donor serosurveillance program.Disclaimer The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the policy of the National Institutes of Health or the Department of Health and Human Services. Any specific brandnames included in this manuscript are for identification purposes only and are not intended to represent an endorsement by CDC. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authorsand do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors were supported by research contracts from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI Contracts HHSN 75N92019D00032 and HHSN 75N92019D00033) as well as with funding support from the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), NIH.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was reviewed by the UCSF Committee for Human Research and determined to meet the definition of research as defined in 46.102(l) but did not involve human subjects based on anonymization of data and routine consent for blood donation testing that includes use of residual samples for research purposes (as defined in 46.103(e)(1) consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy (45 C.F.R. part 46; 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. p241(d), 5 U.S.C. p552a, 44 U.S.C. p3501)).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data is not being made publicly available for privacy reasons related to federal regulations but a limited dataset may be made available upon request after formal review by NHLBI and CDC's privacy office before release.