PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Shincy, M R
AU  - Govindan, Vandana
AU  - Sudhakar, H H
AU  - Venkatesha, V T
AU  - Padmapriya, K
AU  - Ravikumar, K L
TI  - COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN LATERAL FLOW, ELISA AND ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAYS FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 ANTIBODIES AMONG HEALTHCARE WORKERS
AID  - 10.1101/2021.04.29.21256260
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.04.29.21256260
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/30/2021.04.29.21256260.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/30/2021.04.29.21256260.full
AB  - Background Medical professionals and researchers have been urging the need for wide and rapid testing of citizens in order to plan measures that can contain the spread of the virus. Antibody tests play an important role throughout the patient care pathway and are vital for the management and surveillance of the virus. Although RT-PCR is considered as the gold standard, serological tests based on antibodies are helpful for on-time detection. We performed one to one assessment of point-of-care lateral flow assay (POCTs), enzyme immunoassay (EIAs), electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG antibody.Materials and Methods 611 healthcare workers were recruited between November and December 2020 at Central Research Laboratory, KIMS. Collected serum samples were analysed according to manufacturer’s protocol. The Standard Q IgG/IgM combo assay, Anti-SARS CoV-2 Human IgG ELISA, and the Elecsys® to measure the IgG titer of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).Results The kits displayed a sensitivity of 61.2%,79.5%, 91.8% and specificity of 61.7%,64.1%,80.2% for the Standard Q IgG/IgM combo assay, Anti-SARS CoV-2 Human IgG ELISA, and the Elecsys® in order.Conclusion Our results indicate high sensitivity and specificity for the Elecsys® assay compared to Anti-SARS CoV-2 Human IgG ELISA, the Standard Q IgG/IgM combo assay.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study is funded by KIMSAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was conducted according to the ethical requirements established by the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee of Kempegowda Institute of Medical Science approved the study.(KIMS/IEC/A044/M/2020)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [Shincy M R], upon reasonable request