PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Philip, Keir EJ
AU  - Cartwright, Lucy L
AU  - Westlake, Debra
AU  - Nyakoojo, Grace
AU  - Kimuli, Ivan
AU  - Kirenga, Bruce
AU  - Brakema, Evelyn A
AU  - Orme, Mark W
AU  - Fancourt, Daisy
AU  - Hopkinson, Nicholas S
AU  - Jones, Rupert
AU  - Katagira, Winceslaus
TI  - Music and Dance in respiratory disease management in Uganda: A qualitative study of patient and healthcare professional perspectives
AID  - 10.1101/2021.04.27.21255985
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.04.27.21255985
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/28/2021.04.27.21255985.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/28/2021.04.27.21255985.full
AB  - Introduction Music and dance are increasingly used as adjunctive arts-in-health interventions in high-income settings, with a growing body of research suggesting biopsychosocial benefits. Such low-cost, low-resource interventions may have application in low-resource settings such as Uganda. However, research on perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals regarding such approaches is lacking.Methods We delivered taster music and dance for chronic respiratory disease (CRD) sessions to patients and healthcare professionals. We then conducted an exploratory qualitative study, using thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with the healthcare professionals and patients regarding i) the role of music and dance in Ugandan life and ii) the perceived acceptability and feasibility of using music and dance in CRD management in Uganda.Results Eleven patients with long-term respiratory conditions and eight healthcare professionals were interviewed after selection by purposeful convenience sampling. Four key themes were identified from (interview) analysis: Music and dance: 1) were central components of daily life; 2) had an established role supporting health and wellbeing; 3) had strong therapeutic potential in respiratory disease management; 4) the importance of modulating demographic considerations of culture and religion, and age.Conclusion Music and dance are central to life in Uganda, with established roles supporting health and wellbeing. These roles could be built on in the development of music and dance interventions as adjuncts to established components of CRD disease management like pulmonary rehabilitation. Through consideration of key contextual factors, and co-development and adaptation of interventions, such approaches are likely to be well received.What is already known?Music and dance are increasingly being used as adjunctive components of CRD management in high resource settings, with a growing body of research suggesting such approaches are effective, well-received, and can be delivered at low cost. However, the perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals about potential application of such approaches in low-resource settings, such as Uganda, is not known.What are the new findings?Music and dance have central roles in the social, religious and cultural life in Uganda, including a clear view that participation supports both collective and individual health and wellbeing. In this study, both healthcare professionals and patients saw great potential for the use of music and dance as interventions for people with CRD, and highlighted important factors for consideration for successful implementation.What do the new findings imply?Music and dance interventions for people with long-term respiratory conditions in Uganda are likely to be accepted with enthusiasm due to the existing role of such activities in daily life. Delivery is likely to be feasible, but interventions would need to be co-developed with patients, their family members, and healthcare professionals, considering a number of key factors. Suggested approaches to address these considerations are provided. More generally, this study highlights how genuine co-design processes can provide valuable insights into health intervention development.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNot a clinical trial.Funding StatementKP was supported by National Institute for Health Research Academic Clinical Fellowship award and the Imperial College Clinician Investigator Scholarship. The funders had no say in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. This publication presents independent research. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. DF was supported by the Wellcome Trust [205407/Z/16/Z]. The research leading to these results has received support from the EU Research and Innovation program Horizon2020 (H2020 European Research Council) under grant agreement no. 680997, part of the Health, Medical Research and the Challenge of Ageing Horizon 2020 action, and funding from the University of Plymouth Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) internal fund.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was granted by the Mulago Hospital Research and Ethics Committee (Reference number MHREC:1478) and the University of Plymouth Faculty Research Ethics and Integrity Committee (19/20-1164). All participants provided written informed consent. All research activities were conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.