PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Turgoose, David AU - Kerr, Stephanie AU - De Coppi, Paolo AU - Blackburn, Simon AU - Wilkinson, Simon AU - Rooney, Natasha AU - Martin, Richard AU - Gray, Suzanne AU - Hudson, Lee D TI - Prevalence of traumatic psychological stress reactions in children and parents following paediatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis AID - 10.1101/2021.04.21.21255853 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.04.21.21255853 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/25/2021.04.21.21255853.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/25/2021.04.21.21255853.full AB - Background Children undergoing surgery, and their parents, are at risk of developing post-traumatic stress reactions. We systematically reviewed the literature to understand the prevalence of this issue, as well as potential risk factors.Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, using PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Google Scholar, with searches conducted in February 2021. Papers were included if they measured post-traumatic stress in children and/or parents following paediatric surgery, and were excluded if they did not use a validated measure of post-traumatic stress. Data was extracted from published reports.Findings Our search yielded a total of 1,672 papers, of which 16 of met our inclusion criteria. In meta-analysis, pooled studies of children estimated an overall prevalence of 16% meeting criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder post-surgery (N= 187, 95% CI : 5-31%, I2 = 80%). After pooling studies of parents, overall prevalence was estimated at 23% (N= 1444, 95% CI 16-31%, I2 = 91%). Risk factors reported within studies included length of stay, level of social support and parental mental health.Interpretation There is consistent evidence of traumatic stress following surgery in childhood which warrants further investigation. Those delivering surgical care to children would benefit from a raised awareness of the potential for post-traumatic stress in their patients and their families, including offering screening and support.Funding We did not seek or receive any funding for this study.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was applied for or obtained for this workAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This was a meta-analysis of published studies and therefore no ethical permission was required.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis is a meta-analysis but data extracted from studies used is available