RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Frequency of neurological manifestations in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 350 studies
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.20.21255780
DO 10.1101/2021.04.20.21255780
A1 Misra, Shubham
A1 Kolappa, Kavitha
A1 Prasad, Manya
A1 Radhakrishnan, Divya
A1 Thakur, Kiran T
A1 Solomon, Tom
A1 Michael, Benedict Daniel
A1 Winkler, Andrea Sylvia
A1 Beghi, Ettore
A1 Guekht, Alla
A1 Pardo, Carlos A.
A1 Wood, Greta Karen
A1 Chou, Sherry Hsiang-Yi
A1 Fink, Ericka L.
A1 Schmutzhard, Erich
A1 Kheradmand, Amir
A1 Hoo, Fan Kee
A1 Kumar, Amit
A1 Das, Animesh
A1 Srivastava, Achal K
A1 Agarwal, Ayush
A1 Dua, Tarun
A1 Prasad, Kameshwar
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/23/2021.04.20.21255780.abstract
AB Objective To summarize the frequency of neurological manifestations reported in COVID-19 patients and investigate the association of these manifestations with disease severity and mortality.Design Systematic review and meta-analysisEligibility criteria Studies enrolling consecutive COVID-19 patients (probable or confirmed) presenting with neurological manifestations.Data sources PubMed, Medline, Cochrane library, clinicaltrials.gov and EMBASE from 31st December 2019 to 15th December 2020.Data extraction and analysis Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts retrieved by literature search. Risk of bias was examined using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and pooled prevalence and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated for neurological manifestations. Odds ratio (OR) and 95%CI were calculated to determine the association of neurological manifestations with disease severity and mortality. Presence of heterogeneity was assessed using I-square, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses. Statistical analyses were conducted in R version 3.6.2.Results Of 2,455 citations, 350 studies were included in this review, providing data on 145,634 COVID-19 patients, 89% of whom were hospitalized. Forty-one neurological manifestations (24 symptoms and 17 diagnoses) were identified. Pooled prevalence of the most common neurological symptoms included: fatigue (32%), myalgia (20%), taste impairment (21%), smell impairment (19%) and headache (13%). A low risk of bias was observed in 85% of studies; studies with higher risk of bias yielded higher prevalence estimates. Stroke was the most common neurological diagnosis (pooled prevalence-2%). In COVID-19 patients aged >60, the pooled prevalence of acute confusion/delirium was 34% and the presence of any neurological manifestations in this age group was associated with mortality (OR 1.80; 95%CI 1.11 to 2.91).Conclusions Up to one-third of COVID-19 patients analysed in this review experienced at least one neurological manifestation. One in 50 patients experienced stroke. In those over 60, more than one-third had acute confusion/delirium; the presence of neurological manifestations in this group was associated with near doubling of mortality. Results must be interpreted keeping in view the limitations of observational studies and associated bias.Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020181867.What is already known on this topic The frequency of neurological manifestations including fatigue, myalgia, taste and smell impairments, headache and dizziness in COVID-19 patients has been reported in a few systematic reviews and meta-analyses. However, considerable heterogeneity has been observed in terms of methodological quality of the studies, severity of the disease, mean age and hospitalization status of the patients. The evidence regarding the frequency of neurological diagnoses including stroke, encephalitis, Guillain Barré syndrome (GBS) is also limited to case reports and case series and no data exists thus far on the pooled prevalence estimates for neurological diagnoses in COVID-19 patients.What this study adds To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the largest systematic review and meta-analysis to date (including 350 studies with data on 145,634 cases) summarizing the evidence on the frequency of the full spectrum of neurological manifestations in COVID-19 patients in the overall, young and elderly populations. For the first time, our review reports the pooled prevalence of stroke in COVID-19 patients. Risk of bias, old age and disease severity were potential determinants of the frequency and nature of neurological manifestations as well as its association with mortality. Our review also highlights the need to develop reporting standards for studies describing the frequency of clinical features. Moreover, we note that this will be the first systematic review and meta-analysis on this subject to include studies reported in all languages.Competing Interest StatementSHYC serves as a member of Board of Directors to the Neurocritical Care Society. KTT is being funded from Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on COVID-19 related research. TS was Chair/Co-Chair of the UKRI/NIHR COVID-19 Rapid Response and Rolling Funding Initiatives, is an Advisor to the UK COVID-19 Therapeutics Advisory Panel and a member of the MHRA COVID-19 Vaccines Benefit Risk Expert Working Group. EB reports grants from Italian Ministry of Health, grants from SOBI, personal fees from Arvelle Therapeutics, grants from American ALS Association, outside the submitted work. All other co-authors declare no competing interests.Clinical TrialProspero Registration ID: CRD42020181867Funding StatementThis review was supported in part by funding from the World Health Organization.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe full dataset and statistical codes will be available upon reasonable request.