RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Two Stage Hierarchical Group Testing Strategy to Increase SARS-CoV-2 Testing Capacity at an Institution of Higher Education: A Retrospective Analysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.14.21255494
DO 10.1101/2021.04.14.21255494
A1 Ganz, Troy
A1 Waithe-Alleyne, Markus
A1 Slate, Deirdre
A1 Donner, Rachel
A1 Hines, Kevin
A1 Abel, Gyorgy
A1 Auclair, Jared
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/20/2021.04.14.21255494.abstract
AB Population testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 (SAR-CoV-2) is necessary owing to the possibility of viral transmission from asymptomatic cases, yet scarcity of reagents and equipment has added to the cost-prohibitive implementation of screening campaigns at institutions of higher education. The high analytical sensitivities of leading nucleic acid amplification diagnostic methods allow for group testing to increase testing capacity. A feasibility study was performed using an optimized testing configuration model for pooling three, five, and ten samples. Following the standard RNA extraction and purification workflow for quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) method using Thermo Fisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 multiplex primers and probes for the ORF1ab, N, and S genes, matrix and dilution effects were assessed using pooled negative samples as the diluent. Probit analysis produced a limit of detection of 16075 (ORF1ab), 1308 (N), and 1180182 (S) genomic copy equivalents per milliliter. Trials comparing neat to 1:5 dilution for 34 weak-to-strongly positive samples demonstrated average threshold cycle (CT) shifts of 2.31±1.16 (ORF1ab), 2.23±1.12 (N), and 2.79±1.40 (S). Notwithstanding observed S gene dropouts, the false negative rate was unaffected. As the ratio of asymptomatic positive to symptomatic positive SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals was approximately 4:1 and the average prevalence was 0.16% since we started testing in August 2020, pooled testing was identified as a viable, cost-effective option for monitoring the Northeastern University community.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding statementAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Northeastern University's IRB provide reviewed and provided and exemption letter for this researchAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData can be made available upon request.