RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The impact of technology systems and professional support in digital mental health interventions: a secondary meta-analysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.12.21255333
DO 10.1101/2021.04.12.21255333
A1 Sasseville, Maxime
A1 LeBlanc, Annie
A1 Tchuente, Jack
A1 Boucher, Mylène
A1 Dugas, Michèle
A1 Gisèle, Mbemba
A1 Barony, Romina
A1 Chouinard, Maud-Christine
A1 Beaulieu, Marianne
A1 Beaudet, Nicolas
A1 Skidmore, Becky
A1 Cholette, Pascale
A1 Aspiros, Christine
A1 Larouche, Alain
A1 Chabot, Guylaine
A1 Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/19/2021.04.12.21255333.abstract
AB Background A rapid review of systematic reviews was conducted to assess the effectiveness of digital mental health interventions for people with a chronic disease. Although it provided an overview of the evidence, it offered limited understanding of ethe types of interventions that were the most effective. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of primary studies identified in this rapid review of systematic reviews by focusing on the needs of knowledge users.Methods This secondary meta-analysis follows a rapid review of systematic reviews, a virtual workshop with knowledge users to identify research questions and a modified Delphi study to guide research methods. We conducted a secondary analysis of the primary studies identified in the rapid review. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts and applied inclusion criteria: RCT design using a digital mental health intervention in a population of adults with another chronic condition, published after 2010 in French or English, and including an outcome measurement of anxiety or depression.Results 708 primary studies were extracted from the systematic reviews and 84 primary studies met the inclusion criteria Digital mental health interventions were significantly more effective than in-person care for both anxiety and depression outcomes. Online messaging was the most effective technology to improve anxiety and depression scores; however, all technology types were effective. Interventions partially supported by healthcare professionals were more effective than self-administered.Conclusions While our meta-analysis identifies digital intervention’s characteristics that are more effective, all technologies and levels of support can be used considering implementation context and population.Review registration The protocol for this review is registered in the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Service (ID 75).Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis review was funded by the Canadian Institute for Health Research in the Operating Grant: Knowledge Synthesis: COVID-19 in Mental Health & Substance Use. Grant number: 202005CMS-442711-CMV-CFBA-111141Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not applicableAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.