RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Understanding the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on delivery of rehabilitation in specialist palliative care services: An analysis of the CovPall-Rehab survey data
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.13.21255380
DO 10.1101/2021.04.13.21255380
A1 Bayly, Joanne
A1 Bradshaw, Andy
A1 Fettes, Lucy
A1 Omarjee, Muhammed
A1 Talbot-Rice, Helena
A1 Walshe, Catherine
A1 Sleeman, Katherine E
A1 Bajwah, Sabrina
A1 Dunleavy, Lesley
A1 Hocaoglu, Mevhibe
A1 Oluyase, Adejoke
A1 Garner, Ian
A1 Cripps, Rachel L
A1 Preston, Nancy
A1 Fraser, Lorna K
A1 Murtagh, Fliss EM
A1 Higginson, Irene J
A1 Maddocks, Matthew
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/19/2021.04.13.21255380.abstract
AB Background Palliative rehabilitation involves multi-professional processes and interventions aimed at optimising patients’ symptom self-management, independence, and social participation throughout advanced illness. Rehabilitation services were highly disrupted during the Covid-19 pandemic.Aim To understand rehabilitation provision in palliative care services during the Covid-19 pandemic, identifying and reflecting on adaptative and innovative practice to inform ongoing provision.Design Cross-sectional national online survey.Setting/participants Rehabilitation leads for specialist palliative care services across hospice, hospital, or community settings, conducted from 30/07/20 to 21/09/2020.Findings 61 completed responses (England, n=55; Scotland, n=4; Wales, n=1; and Northern Ireland, n=1) most frequently from services based in hospices (56/61, 92%) providing adult rehabilitation. Most services (55/61, 90%) reported rehabilitation provision becoming remote during Covid-19 and half reported reduced caseloads. Rehabilitation teams frequently had staff members on sick-leave with suspected/confirmed Covid-19 (27/61, 44%), redeployed to other services/organisations (25/61, 41%) or furloughed (15/61, 26%). Free text responses were constructed into four themes: (i) fluctuating shared spaces; (ii) remote and digitised rehabilitation offer; (iii) capacity to provide and participate in rehabilitation; (iv) Covid-19 as a springboard for positive change. These represent how rehabilitation services contracted, reconfigured, and were redirected to more remote modes of delivery, and how this affected the capacity of clinicians and patients to participate in rehabilitation.Conclusion This study demonstrates how changes in provision of rehabilitation during the pandemic could act as a springboard for positive changes. Hybrid models of rehabilitation have the potential to expand the equity of access and reach of rehabilitation within specialist palliative care.What is already known about the topic?Guidelines recommend that rehabilitation targeting function, well-being, and social participation is provided by specialist palliative care services.Prior to Covid-19, there was variable provision of palliative rehabilitation in the UK. This variation was related to local service priorities, funding, and commissioning constraints.What this paper addsOver time, Covid-19 related disruptions forced services to reconfigure and adapt which caused fluctuations in the shared spaces in which health professionals, patients and family care givers met to participate in rehabilitation.These fluctuations resulted in the adoption of digital and remote forms of care which altered health professionals’ and patients’ capacity to participate in, and the equity of access to and reach of, rehabilitation.Covid-19 has acted as a springboard for learning, with many rehabilitation services hoping to move into the future by (re)gaining losses and integrating these with lessons learned during the pandemic.Implications for practice, theory or policyRecommendations are made to support extended reach and more equitable access to rehabilitation in palliative care services.We recommend mixed methods evaluations of hybrid models of in-person and online rehabilitation across palliative care settings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding Statement: Jointly funded by UKRI and NIHR [COV0011; MR/V012908/1]. Additional support was from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Applied Research Collaboration, South London, hosted at Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, and Cicely Saunders International (Registered Charity No. 1087195). JB is supported by the NIHR ARC SL. MM is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Career Development Fellowship (CDF-2017-10-009) and NIHR ARC SL. IJH is a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Emeritus Senior Investigator and is supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South London (SL) at Kings College Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust. IJH leads the Palliative and End of Life Care theme of the NIHR ARC SL and co-leads the national theme in this. LKF is funded by a NIHR Career Development Fellowship (award CDF-2018-11-ST2-002). KES is funded by a NIHR Clinician Scientist Fellowship (CS-2015-15-005). RC is funded by Cicely Saunders International. MBH is supported by the NIHR ARC SL. FEM is an NIHR Senior Investigator. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Research ethics committee approval was obtained from Kings College London Research Ethics Committee 21st April 2020 Reference LRS 19/20-18541All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData sharing: Applications for use of the survey data can be made for up to 10 years, and will be considered on a case by case basis on receipt of a methodological sound proposal to achieve aims in line with the original protocol. The study protocol is available on request. All requests for data access should be addressed to the Chief Investigator via the details on the CovPall website (https://www.kcl.ac.uk/cicelysaunders/research/evaluating/covpall-study, and palliativecare{at}kcl.ac.uk) and will be reviewed by the Study Steering Group.