PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Crowe, John AU - Schnaubelt, Andy T. AU - Schmidt-Bonne, Scott AU - Angell, Kathleen AU - Bai, Julia AU - Eske, Teresa AU - Nicklin, Molly AU - Pratt, Catherine AU - White, Bailey AU - Crotts-Hannibal, Brodie AU - Staffend, Nicholas AU - Herrera, Vicki AU - Cobb, Jeramie AU - Conner, Jennifer AU - Carstens, Julie AU - Tempero, Jonell AU - Bouda, Lori AU - Ray, Matthew AU - Lawler, James V. AU - Campbell, W. Scott AU - Lowe, John-Martin AU - Santarpia, Joshua AU - Bartelt-Hunt, Shannon AU - Wiley, Michael AU - Brett-Major, David AU - Logan, Cheryl AU - Broadhurst, M. Jana TI - Pilot program for test-based SARS-CoV-2 screening and environmental monitoring in an urban public school district AID - 10.1101/2021.04.14.21255036 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.04.14.21255036 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/17/2021.04.14.21255036.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/17/2021.04.14.21255036.full AB - Importance Scalable programs for school-based SARS-CoV-2 testing and surveillance are needed to guide in-person learning practices and inform risk assessments in K-12 settings.Objectives To characterize SARS-CoV-2 infections in staff and students in an urban public school setting and evaluate test-based strategies to support ongoing risk assessment and mitigation for K-12 in-person learning.Design, Setting, and Participants The pilot program engaged three schools for weekly saliva PCR testing of staff and students participating in in-person learning over a 5-week period. Wastewater, air, and surface samples were collected weekly and tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA to determine surrogacy for case detection and interrogate transmission risk of in-building activities.Main Outcomes and Measures SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva and environmental samples and risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection.Results 2,885 supervised self-collected saliva samples were tested from 773 asymptomatic staff and students during November and December, 2020. 46 cases (22 students, 24 staff) were detected, representing a 5.8- and 2.5-fold increase in case detection rates among students and staff, respectively, compared to conventional reporting mechanisms. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in wastewater samples from all pilot schools, as well as in air samples collected from two choir rooms. Sequencing of 21 viral genomes in saliva specimens demonstrated minimal clustering associated with one school. Geographic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 cases reported district-wide demonstrated higher community risk in zip codes proximal to the pilot schools.Conclusions and Relevance Weekly screening of asymptomatic staff and students by saliva PCR testing dramatically increased SARS-CoV-2 case detection in an urban public-school setting, exceeding infection rates reported at the county level. Experiences differed among schools, and virus sequencing and geographic analyses suggest a dynamic interplay of school-based and community-derived transmission risk. Environmental testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in air and surface samples enabled real-time risk assessment of in-school activities and allowed for interventions in choir classes. Wastewater testing demonstrated the utility of school building-level SARS-CoV-2 surveillance. Collectively, these findings provide insight into the performance and community value of test-based SARS-CoV-2 screening and surveillance strategies in the K-12 educational setting.Question Do test-based programs reduce SARS-CoV-2 risk in K-12 schools?Findings Weekly school-based saliva PCR testing at three urban public schools doubled case detection among staff and students over symptom-based strategies, exceeding county-level case rates. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in school wastewater samples each week, as well as air and surface samples related to choir classrooms.Meaning Routine SARS-CoV-2 testing removes infected staff and students from school who are not identified through conventional case detection. With rigorous infection control and environmental monitoring, this helps mitigate risk during school operations. Furthermore, screening in K-12 schools may provide insight into disease burdens of undertested communities.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis project was supported by philanthropic and internal funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional Review Board, University of Nebraska Medical CenterAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll viral genome sequences referenced in this study have been deposited in the GISAID database. https://www.gisaid.org