PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Husted, Rasmus Skov
AU  - Troelsen, Anders
AU  - Husted, Henrik
AU  - Grønfeldt, Birk
AU  - Thorborg, Kristian
AU  - Kallemose, Thomas
AU  - Rathleff, Michael Skovdal
AU  - Bandholm, Thomas
TI  - Does <em>one</em> exercise a day make the knee stronger and keep surgery away? A randomized dose-response trial of home-based knee-extensor exercise in patients eligible for knee replacement (the QUADX-1 trial)
AID  - 10.1101/2021.04.07.21254965
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.04.07.21254965
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/07/2021.04.07.21254965.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/07/2021.04.07.21254965.full
AB  - Objectives To firstly investigate the efficacy of three different dosages of home-based, knee-extensor strength exercise on isometric knee-extensor strength in patients eligible for knee replacement due to severe knee osteoarthritis, and secondly, the influence of exercise on symptoms, physical function and decision on surgery.Design Randomized dose-response trial.Setting Primary and secondary care.Participants One-hundred and forty patients eligible for knee replacement were included. Eligibility for surgery was assessed by an orthopedic surgeon specialized in knee arthroplasty.Interventions Patients were randomized to three groups; 2, 4 or 6 home-based knee-extensor exercise-sessions per week (group 2, 4 and 6 respectively) for 12 weeks (N=47/group). Exercise instruction was given by a trained physiotherapist.Main outcome measures The primary outcome was isometric knee-extensor strength. Secondary outcomes were Oxford Knee Score, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, average knee pain last week (0-10 numeric rating scale), 6-minute walk test, stair climbing test, exercise adherence and “need for surgery”. The primary endpoint was after 12 weeks of exercise (before surgery) and the secondary after surgery. Outcome assessors and patients were blinded to allocation.Results After 12 weeks of exercise, data were available for 117 patients (N=39/group). Isometric knee-extensor strength increased in all groups but intention-to-treat analysis showed no difference between the three groups in change from baseline to after 12 weeks of exercise in isometric knee-extensor muscle strength: Group 2 vs. 4 (0.009 Nm/kg [95% CI−0.15 to 0.17], P=0.913), group 2 vs. 6 (−0.03 Nm/kg [95% CI−0.18 to 0.13], P=0.725) and group 4 vs. 6 (−0.04 Nm/kg [95% CI−0.20 to 0.13], P=0.668). For the secondary outcomes a significant difference before surgery was found between group 2 and group 6 for Oxford Knee Score (4.2 [95% CI 0.6 to 7.8], P=0.02) and average knee pain last week (NRS 0-10) (−1.1 [95%−2.2 to−0.1], P=0.03) in favour of group 2. No other differences were observed before and after surgery. After the 12-week exercise intervention, 38 (32.5%) patients wanted surgery and 79 (67.5%) postponed surgery. This was independent of exercise dosage.Conclusion Knee-extensor strength increased with both 2, 4 and 6 exercise sessions per week but none of the prescribed exercise dosages were superior to the others for the primary outcome isometric knee-extensor strength after 12 weeks. Two home-based knee-extensor exercise sessions a week seems superior to six for patient-reported outcomes, and across exercise dosages, only one in three patients decided to have surgery after the coordinated home-based exercise intervention.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02931058, pre-registered October 10th, 2016. Protocol PubMed (PMID: 29347947).What is already known on this topic Clinical guidelines recommend exercise therapy targeting the knee-extensor muscles in patients eligible for knee replacement before surgery is considered.Exercise therapy may reduce knee osteoarthritis symptoms and impact the decision on surgery, but the dose-response relationship is not described.Exercise therapy is typically delivered as supervised programs requiring physical attendance at fixed times and often require self-payment, which may be a barrier for some patients.What this study adds Knee-extensor strength increased with 2, 4 and 6 exercise sessions per week, but none of the prescribed exercise dosages were superior to the others after 12 weeks – indicating no dose-response relationship.Two in three patients eligible for knee replacement decided to postpone knee replacement surgery after 12 weeks of home-based exercise with one simple exercise.This study successfully employed a model of coordinated care where the patients’ decision on surgical treatment was re-evaluated based on symptom changes following simple home-based exercise therapy. These findings suggest using a model of coordinated non-surgical and surgical care to improve the decision on surgery for patients eligible for knee replacement.Competing Interest StatementConflict of Interests, Anders Troelsen: Appointed speaker for Zimmer Biomet. Paid consultant for Zimmer Biomet and Pfizer Denmark. Principal investigator and has received research support from Zimmer Biomet and Pfizer Denmark. Been a member of the board at the European Knee Society (EKS) since 2015. Clinical TrialNCT02931058Clinical Protocols https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-017-2366-9 Funding StatementThis work was supported by grants from The Capital Regions strategic funds (R142-A5363), The Capital Regions foundation for cross-continuum research (P-2015-1-01, P-2018-1-02, P-2019-1-03), The Danish Rheumatism Association (R156-A4923) and Copenhagen University Hospital Amager-Hvidovres strategic funds (2019-800). The funding sources had no role in this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Approvals from the Ethics Committee of the Capital Region, Denmark (H-16025136) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (2012-58-0004) were obtained before the first patient was enrolled.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe raw data is available by contacting the corresponding author Rasmus Skov Husted via email: rasmus.skov.husted{at}regionh.dk