RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Patient perspectives on healthcare at the time of COVID-19 and suggestions for care redesign after the pandemic: a qualitative study in all six WHO regions
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.06.21254840
DO 10.1101/2021.04.06.21254840
A1 Stamm, Tanja A
A1 Seidler, Yuki
A1 Andrews, Margaret R
A1 Eghbali, Mohammad
A1 Kiguli, Juliet
A1 Ritschl, Valentin
A1 Omara, Maisa
A1 Schaffer, Gertraud
A1 Mosor, Erika
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/07/2021.04.06.21254840.abstract
AB Objective The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered significant changes in healthcare. As they were mainly driven by professionals and are likely to influence healthcare in the future, it is of utmost importance to consider patients’ perspectives equally. We, therefore, explored the lived experiences of patients and patient representatives in all six World Health Organisation (WHO) regions regarding healthcare at the time of COVID-19 and extracted suggestions for care redesign after the pandemic.Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews until saturation. Thematic analysis followed a modified form of meaning condensation. We established rigour by transcript checking, inter-coder agreement, quote variation and standardised reporting.Results Disadvantaged people experienced an unprecedented inequity in healthcare due to the pandemic. The main reasons were the reduction in public care services and limited access to information, transportation, technology and income. Stigmatisation from COVID-19 differed between cultural contexts and ranged from none to feeling “ashamed” and “totally bashed”. Participants experienced telehealth as indispensable but with limitations. These included giving “bad news”, such as having an eye removed because of melanoma, and the difficulty of providing end-of-life care over the phone. Patient representatives redefined their role and became indispensable influencers throughout the pandemic and beyond.Conclusion We reached out to individuals with a diversity of perspectives, including minorities and marginalised populations. A systematic exclusion of people with limited technology access increases inequity in healthcare and biases research findings. Since preferences and personal meanings drive behaviour and could be foundations for targeted interventions, they must be considered in all groups of people to increase society’s resilience as a whole.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna (EK Number 1388/2020).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data generated in this qualitative study is not suitable for sharing beyond what is contained within this publication and its supplements. Further information can be obtained from the corresponding author.