RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Understanding how Victoria, Australia gained control of its second COVID-19 wave
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.03.21254866
DO 10.1101/2021.04.03.21254866
A1 Trauer, James M
A1 Lydeamore, Michael J
A1 Dalton, Gregory W
A1 Pilcher, David
A1 Meehan, Michael T
A1 McBryde, Emma S
A1 Cheng, Allen C
A1 Sutton, Brett
A1 Ragonnet, Romain
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/07/2021.04.03.21254866.abstract
AB Victoria has been Australia’s hardest hit state by the COVID-19 pandemic, but was successful in reversing its second wave of infections through aggressive policy interventions. The clear reversal in the epidemic trajectory combined with information on the timing and geographical scope of policy interventions offers the opportunity to estimate the relative contribution of each change. We developed a compartmental model of the COVID-19 epidemic in Victoria that incorporated age and geographical structure, and calibrated it to data on case notifications, deaths and health service needs according to the administrative divisions of Victoria’s healthcare, termed clusters. We achieved a good fit to epidemiological indicators, at both the state level and for individual clusters, through a combination of time-varying processes that included changes to case detection rates, population mobility, school closures, seasonal forcing, physical distancing and use of face coverings. Estimates of the risk of hospitalisation and death among persons with disease that were needed to achieve this close fit were markedly higher than international estimates, likely reflecting the concentration of the epidemic in groups at particular risk of adverse outcomes, such as residential facilities. Otherwise, most fitted parameters were consistent with the existing literature on COVID-19 epidemiology and outcomes. We estimated a significant effect for each of the calibrated time-varying processes on reducing the risk of transmission per contact, with broad estimates of the reduction in transmission risk attributable to seasonal forcing (27.8%, 95% credible interval [95%CI] 9.26-44.7% for mid-summer compared to mid-winter), but narrower estimates for the individual-level effect of physical distancing of 12.5% (95%CI 5.69-27.9%) and of face coverings of 39.1% (95%CI 31.3-45.8%). That the multi-factorial public health interventions and mobility restrictions led to the dramatic reversal in the epidemic trajectory is supported by our model results, with the mandatory face coverings likely to have been particularly important.Competing Interest StatementBS and ACC wish to emphasise their important statutory roles during Victoria's pandemic response in 2020, as Chief Health Office and acting Chief Health Officer respectively. MJL and GWD were also employed by DHHS during 2020. JMT provided regular advice to DHHS during this time as an independent advisor.Funding StatementThe Epidemiological Modelling Unit of Monash University provided the health system cluster-level projections for notifications, admissions and deaths under contract to the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services in 2020. JMT is a recipient of an Early Career Fellowship from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1142638).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Under the rules of our institutions, human research ethics approval was not required for this modelling study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll code used in the simulations presented is available at https://github.com/monash-emu/AuTuMN. The calibration data were provided in confidence by the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, but are numerically very similar to those already in the public domain. https://github.com/monash-emu/AuTuMN https://github.com/monash-emu/summer