RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Clonal transitions and phenotypic evolution in Barrett esophagus
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.03.31.21252894
DO 10.1101/2021.03.31.21252894
A1 Evans, James A
A1 Carlotti, Emanuela
A1 Lin, Meng-Lay
A1 Hackett, Richard J
A1 Passman, Adam
A1 Dunn, Lorna
A1 Elia, George
A1 Porter, Ross J
A1 McClean, Mairi H
A1 Hughes, Frances
A1 ChinAleong, Joanne
A1 Woodland, Philip
A1 Preston, Sean L
A1 Griffin, S Michael
A1 Lovat, Laurence
A1 Rodriguez-Justo, Manuel
A1 Wright, Nicholas A
A1 Jansen, Marnix
A1 McDonald, Stuart AC
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/06/2021.03.31.21252894.abstract
AB Background & Aims Barrett esophagus (BE) is a risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma, however our understanding of how Barrett esophagus evolves is still poorly understood. We demonstrate that dynamic clonal phenotypic changes occur at the gland level, the mechanism by which these changes evolve, and how diversity may play a role in progression.Methods We analyzed the distribution and diversity of gland phenotype between and within BE biopsies and the background mucosa of those that had progressed to dysplasia or developed BE post-esophagectomy, using immunohistochemistry and H&E analysis. Clonal relationships between distinct gland types were determined by laser capture microdissection sequencing of the mitochondrial genome.Results Five different non-dysplastic gland phenotypes were identified in a cohort of 64 patients biopsies taken at the same physical location in the esophagus; most non-dysplastic patients showed a single gland phenotype per biopsy, but some showed two or three gland types. We reveal a shared common ancestor between parietal cell-containing oxynto-cardiac glands and goblet cell-containing specialized Barrett glands through a shared somatic mtDNA mutation. We also reveal a similar relationship between specialized and cardiac-type glands, and specialized and Paneth cell-containing glands. The diversity of gland types was significantly increased adjacent to dysplasia compared to non-dysplastic BE and patients with post-esophagectomy BE, suggesting that gland diversity evolves in BE patients over time.Conclusions We have shown that the range of BE phenotypes represent an evolutionary process and that changes in gland diversity may play a role in progression. Furthermore, we demonstrate common ancestry between gastric and intestinal glands in BE.Graphic abstractA) The cardiac gland as the basic unit of Barrett esophagus that can evolve into phenotypes that adapt to the esophageal microenvironment. B) Phenotypic diversity of non-dysplastic glands is associated with the presence of dysplasia or cancer in patients with BE.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded through a GUTS UK Derek Butler clinical fellowship to JE and a Cancer Research UK programme foundation award to SM (A12446). Institute support was provided through a Cancer Research UK centre grant to the Barts Cancer Centre (C16420/A18066).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:London research ethics committee approval (11/LO/1613 and 15/LO/2127). County Durham and Tees Valley 2 research ethics committee approval (08/H0908/25)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.