RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A patient satisfaction survey and educational package to improve the care of people hospitalised with COVID-19: an observational study, Liverpool, UK
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.03.23.21253630
DO 10.1101/2021.03.23.21253630
A1 Ahmed, Muhammad Shamsher
A1 Hicks, Scott Rory
A1 Watson, Rebecca
A1 Ahmed, Rajia Akter
A1 Jones, Lewis
A1 Vaselli, Marcella
A1 Wu, Meng-San
A1 Hayat, Fatima
A1 Ratcliffe, Libuse
A1 McKenna, Mark
A1 Hine, Paul
A1 Defres, Sylviane
A1 Wingfield, Tom
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/30/2021.03.23.21253630.abstract
AB The experiences of people hospitalised with COVID-19 are under-researched. We designed a COVID-19 patient satisfaction survey and collected responses (n=94) during Liverpool’s first wave (April-June 2020). Although care was generally rated highly, including among people of BAME background, sleep-quality and communication about medications and discharge-planning were identified as areas for improvement. In response, we implemented an education and training package for healthcare professionals working on COVID-19 wards. During Liverpool’s second/third COVID-19 wave, survey responses (n=101) suggested improvement in patient satisfaction across all care domains except discharge-planning and sleep-quality. These UK-first findings are informing local strategies to improve COVID-19 care.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementTW is supported by grants from: the Wellcome Trust, UK (209075/Z/17/Z); the Medical Research Council, Department for International Development, and Wellcome Trust (Joint Global Health Trials, MR/V004832/1), the Academy of Medical Sciences, UK; and the Swedish Health Research Council, Sweden. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This was a quality improvement project (QIP) approved by the Clinical Effectiveness Department of Liverpool University NHS Foundation Trust. Clinical Effectiveness Department has made the decision that as this is a quality improvement project, formal ethical approval is not required. Verbal consent was taken from all participants and they have participated willingly.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be available to review if needed