RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Should We Delay the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose?
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.13.21251652
DO 10.1101/2021.02.13.21251652
A1 Harizi, Intissar
A1 Berkane, Soulaimane
A1 Tayebi, Abdelhamid
A1 Silverman, Michael S.
A1 Stranges, Saverio
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/26/2021.02.13.21251652.abstract
AB Due to the shortage in COVID-19 vaccine supplies and the alarming sanitary situation engendered by the COVID-19 pandemic, some countries have opted to delay the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine for some period of time, aiming at getting the first dose of the vaccine in the arms of a large number of people, before proceeding with the second dose administration [11, 16]. This strategy has sparked some heated debates world-wide for its pros and cons, and no clear consensus is reached among experts [6, 10]. Without taking side in this matter, we tried to answer the following question, from a pure mathematical perspective: should we delay the second dose of the vaccine or not?. We show that the answer to this question depends tightly on the efficacy of the first and the second COVID-19 vaccine doses. In fact, if the efficacy of the first dose α1is greater than α2/(1 + 0.01α2), where α2 is the efficacy of the second dose, the optimal strategy to maximize the number of effectively vaccinated people is to delay the second vaccine as much as possible (up to the maximum period prescribed by the clinical recommendations). Otherwise, the optimal strategy would consists in administering the second dose as quickly as possible (while respecting the minimum period between the two doses as prescribed by the clinical recommendations). Although our result can be considered primarily for general population vaccination strategies/decision making, different approaches may be required for high-risk sub-populations. The maximum delay between doses will require efficacy data from ongoing programs, however our approach will help inform policymakers in assessing this data.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research work is supported by the National Research Council of Canada, under the grants NSERC-DG RGPIN-2020-04759 and NSERC-DG RGPIN-2020-0627.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:CER-UQOAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThere is not data associated with this paper.